Ships from: Broomfield, CO
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping Options:
(Hardcover)
Details from Seller
Comments from the Seller: Amherst, New York, U.S.A. 2003 Hard Cover First Edition-1st. Printing Very Good in Very Good jacket Ex-Library. 8vo-over 7¾"-9¾" tall. Copy has inked notation on fep, stamped on same, tea or coffee splash on the foreside, dj has some library stickers, mylar protective dj. Interesting study that centers on the crucial trial that determined who invented the computer, the trial was held in 1973 at issue-Was it John Mauchly and Presper Eckert, whose ENIAC was unveiled to the world in 1946? or was it John Atanasoff whose ABC was resurrected decades later to play a crucial role in the multimillion dollar lawsuit? Illustrated with b/w photographs. 463pp. Desirable!
About the Seller
Seller Name: Abyssbooks
Feedback Rating:
(131 ratings)
Authorized Seller Since: 2005
Ships From: Broomfield, CO
The story begins with the legal testimony of John W. Marchly and John V. Atanasoff and the findings of Judge Eral R. Larson in the 1971-72 trial. Then Burks explores public opinion, and summarizes the controversy. She writes extensively about the early history of electronic computers. Annotation ©2003 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR
In 1941, physicist John Mauchly visited his colleague John Atanasoff at Iowa State University for a few days, during which they discussed the computer Atanasoff was working on, later called the Atanasoff-Berry Computer (ABC). Within five years, Mauchly would be celebrated as one of the men responsible for the ENIAC, often referred to as the first computer. Thirty years later, what happened during that visit would become the core of a lengthy patent case and grist for countless speculative articles. Was the ENIAC based on the ABC? In 1973, Judge Earl L. Larson ruled in Atanasoff's favor, effectively declaring him the inventor of the computer as we know it. Among aficionados of the history of computing, there's widespread feeling that Larson blew the call, and it is this perception that Burks is intent on demolishing. Exhaustively citing the trial transcript as well as the conflicted reaction of the computing community, the author amply demonstrates Atanasoff's credibility and Mauchly's evasiveness about that meeting. She also persuasively demonstrates the manifold leap forward the ABC represented. In a way, Burks's account is undermined by the sheer strength of her case: most readers will be entirely convinced after only a couple of chapters. However, this thorough treatment of an important subject is invaluable. Photos. (Feb.) Forecast: People who avidly read the various publications the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) puts out will doubtless become immersed in the wealth of detail Burks presents. But those who can't distinguish a vacuum tube from a light bulb will probably find this methodical and often technical work daunting. Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information.
More Reviews and Recommendations