(Paperback - Reprint)
Many men believe that they can force women to have sex against their will and that it isn't rape--at least, not if the man knows the women and doesn't beat her up or wield a weapon. The law's casual treatment of such rape cases is the subject of this pioneering book, which is both a powerful exposé of the often shocking facts and a trenchantly written call for reform.
The title refers to acquaintance rape, which the author, a Harvard Law School professor, maintains has frequently been characterized by the courts and the general public as not ``real rape.'' Estrich traces the legal history of rape by a non-stranger. Her unremarkable findings, that acquaintance rape has been and continues to be reported less often than stranger rape, to be prosecuted less frequently, and to result in conviction less often, are stated and restated throughout this very short bookonly about 100 pages are devoted to the text, the balance consisting of indexes and notes. She makes an articulate plea for change in the law and its application so that it will no longer be the rape victim who has to prove her innocence. Recommended for larger law collections. Anne Twitchell, Sch. of Architecture Library, University of Maryland, College Park
More Reviews and RecommendationsSusan Estrich is Robert Kingsley Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of Southern California.
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
October 23, 2003: I do not condone rape and I oppose anyone who would perform such a violent, degrading act but the author is mistaken if she thinks that YES sometimes means NO. NO means NO and YES means YES, period. Deviation from this basic logic forces a gray area condition and that's delusional. The author is on a witch hunt and most of the material isn't worth the time spent reading it.
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
February 02, 2001: Give me a break. This book is a joke. Tries to identify problems that simply don't exist. I appreciate Ms. Estrich's own unfortunate experiences, but that doesn't justify broadsweeping, unfounded, unsupported and counterintuitive conclusions. A world that simply doesn;t exist . . . thank God.