The Rejection of Continental Drift: Theory and Method in American Earth Science by Naomi Oreskes

BUY IT NEW

  • $95.00 List price
    $90.80 Online price
    $81.72 Member price
    (Save 13%)
    Limited Time Offer! Everyone receives the Member Price on books.
    See Details
  • skip to cart
  • Add To List uiAction=GetAllLists&page=List&pageType=list&ean=9780195117332&productCode=BK&maxCount=100&threshold=3

GET FREE SHIPPING ON ORDERS OF $25 OR MORE

DELIVERY & GIFT DETAILS:

Usually ships within 24 hours

Delivery Time and Shipping Rates

Eligible for gift wrap & gift message.

BUY IT USED

11 copies from $27.25

See All Available

Textbook (Paperback - New Edition)

  • 432pp
  • Sales Rank: 585,774

Textbook Information

  • ISBN-13: 9780195117332
  • Edition Description: New Edition
  • Edition Number: 1
  • Pub. Date: January 1999
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press
Buy it Used: 11 copies from $27.25 See All Available

Customers who bought this also bought

 
  • Overview
  • Editorial Reviews
  • Features

Product Details

  • Pub. Date: January 1999
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press
  • Format: Textbook Paperback, 432pp
  • Sales Rank: 585,774

Synopsis

In the early twentieth century, American earth scientists were united in their opposition to the new—and highly radical—notion of continental drift, even going so far as to label the theory "unscientific." Some fifty years later, however, continental drift was heralded as a major scientific breakthrough and today it is accepted as scientific fact. Why did American geologists reject so adamantly an idea that is now considered a cornerstone of the discipline? And why were their European colleagues receptive to it so much earlier? This book, based on extensive archival research on three continents, provides important new answers while giving the first detailed account of the American geological community in the first half of the century. Challenging previous historical work on this episode, Naomi Oreskes shows that continental drift was not rejected for the lack of a causal mechanism, but because it seemed to conflict with the basic standards of practice in American geology. This account provides a compelling look at how scientific ideas are made and unmade.

More Reviews and Recommendations

Biography

University of California, San Diego

Customer Reviews

  • Reader Rating:
Be the first to write a review!