(Paperback)
Contrary to an assumption basic to European and Chinese history—the tales of Marco Polo’s journey to China—Frances Wood argues that he not only never went to China, but probably never ventured past his family home on the Black Sea. Instead, his imagination fueled by stories garnered from other traders and with the help of a ghostwriter, Polo may simply have sought to exploit the growing demand for tales of distant lands. By carefully examining the Polo family history, Marco Polo’s activities as a merchant, the preparation of his book, and the imperial Chinese records, Wood tries to reconcile a number of inconsistencies that shed light on what may be only an extraordinary and enduring myth.
Wood (A Companion to China, LJ 4/1/90), the head of the Chinese department at the British Library, presents a revisionist view of Marco Polo, arguing that he may not have made the fabulous journey described in his book, A Description of the World. Not really an itinerary, according to Wood, Polo's book is a general geography of Asia containing information that could have been gleaned from the works of other travelers, including Polo's father and uncle, who had visited the Mongol capital Karakorum. Polo's work was dictated to a ghost writer named Rusticello, who, Wood suspects, padded Polo's original tale with any information about Asia that he and Polo could locate. Wood is not dogmatic in her examination and in fact presents all sides of the scholarship fairly. Still, her argument falls apart, since she doesn't say where Polo was if not in China (he could have been a minor civil servant and thus not mentioned in the records of the day). Given the importance of Polo's book to European expansion, it almost seems irrelevant to ask if he actually reached China. Recommended for academic and larger public libraries.Robert J. Andrews, Duluth P.L., Minn.
More Reviews and RecommendationsFrances Wood is head of the Chinese Department at the British Library and author of A Companion to China and The Blue Guide to China, among many other scholarly works.
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
February 08, 2002: frankly, i think this book is grounded more on opinions than fact. Marco polo's trip to China was recently proven possible(it was in national geographic) anyway, where he really went is arbitrary, more important than his actual travels was his book, which had an enormous impact on medieval ideas. just because he didn't discuss foot binding and tea ceremonies doesn't mean that he never saw them, it just means that he didn't care about them as much as he cared about imports, exports, trade routes, and religion(of course he cared about religion, he was part of a mission sent by the pope, and, after all, this is during the age of faith)