
Reserve it at BN.com & pick it up in 60 minutes at your local store.
Enter a zip code
(Hardcover)
"Americans tend to see their history as a parade of events. Yet at the very core of that history has been a debate over ideas and ideology. Hendrickson's brilliant book recounts and reassesses that debate with originality and penetrating insight."Andrew J. Bacevich, author of American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of U.S. Diplomacy
"An original and important work, marked by graceful erudition and judiciousness. . . . A worthy sequel to Hendrickson's acclaimed Peace Pact: The Lost World of the American Founding."David Mayers, author of Dissenting Voices in America's Rise to Power
"A terrific book and magnificent achievement."Peter S. Onuf, author of Jefferson's Empire: The Language of American Nationhood
More Reviews and RecommendationsDavid C. Hendrickson teaches political science at Colorado College, where he is the Robert J. Fox Distinguished Service Professor. He is author or coauthor of seven books, including Peace Pact: The Lost World of the American Founding.
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
June 19, 2009: Wow. I have never read so much nonsensical drivel on a topic that is so inherently interesting. Hendrickson's narrative is not only confusing, but also incredibly misleading. Jumping on a new interpretation of history, he argues that a "Unionist paradigm" is what best characterizes U.S. diplomatic history, if not U.S. history as a whole. Yet this is misleading as the pre-Civil War debate over Union, as I understand, was American's arguing over what sort of nation the United States should be: one of strong ties to a central government with one state's actions affecting everyone or one of loose ties with a sort of benevolent neglect over the internal affairs of the states? This is a debate over national identity, not governmental make-up. And what is infinitesimally worse to me is how Hendrickson shrugs off the imperial tendencies of the United States from its earliest days, making American imperialists out to be a fringe group of nut jobs. The Union itself is an exercise in imperial control! The Civil War proved that, even if the North had lost. There are only two things that make this book interesting at all: Hendrickson, in chapter 23, has one of the best analyses of the causes of the Civil War and his chapters covering the Wilsonian era (chs. 36-39) are very enlightening. But, ultimately, there are far better books on the topics of U.S. diplomatic history ("Dangerous Nation" by Robert Kagan and "From Colony to Superpower" by George C. Herring) that are worth your time and effort.
I Also Recommend: Colossus, From Colony to Superpower, Dangerous Nation.