
Reserve it at BN.com & pick it up in 60 minutes at your local store.
Enter a zip code
(Paperback - REVISED)
| More Formats | |
|---|---|
| Hardcover - Revised Edition | $33.25 |
| Compact Disc - Unabridged, 3 CDs, 3 hours | $21.80 |
| MP3 Book - Abridged | $13.23 |
From Beirut to Jerusalem, winner of the 1989 National Book Award for nonfiction, is the startling, intense and thought–provoking account of Thomas L. Friedman's decade of reporting in the strife–ridden Middle East.
Thomas L. Friedman has won two Pulitzer Prizes – one for his reporting in Beirut and one for reporting in Jerusalem, the two cities at the center of the Arab–Israeli conflict. No two cities have received more headline coverage, nor been more hotly debated, and no reporter has covered them more in depth than Friedman. in his journey from Beirut to Jerusalem, Friedman gives us a panoramic view of both the political and personal conflicts.
As a reporter for UPI and The New York Times, he was stationed in Beirut from 1979 to 1984, and in Lebanon from 1984 to 1989. He describes with intense vividness the sometimes horrifying, sometimes wondrous cities, for which, he says, nothing in his life had prepared him.
Friedman brings alive his journey from Beirut to Jerusalem through anecdotes, history, analysis and self–examination – and puts all the currents into perspective with inimitable detail, clarity and remarkable insight. This is a much–needed framework for understanding the psychology and politics of the Middle East, and for understanding the future of this unique region.
A framework for understanding the region and its problems, each chapter is a stop on the author's own remarkable journey from Beirut to Jerusalem.
A sparkling intellectual guidebook...an engrossing journey not to be missed.
More Reviews and RecommendationsOccasionally blunt, often educational, but never boring, Thomas L. Friedman is among the best known and respected analysts of the Middle East. A three-time Pulitzer winner, his books and column for the New York Times take a no-nonsense, authoritative approach to complex global issues.
More About the AuthorReader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
August 03, 2003: Mr. Friedman is an excellent writer , that is to say his style flows. While he is in my opinion a little to the left for my taste , he is intersting but is not the end all to the issue at hand .
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
June 02, 2003: The fact is Friedman uses his experience of local peoples and places to put some of the most important events in the development of the fault we call the Israeli-Palestinian conflict into a greater historical/geographical context. It can be, if selectively read termed pro-Israeli or anti-Israeli (none daring the term pro-Palestinian). The reality is that the book condemns the slaughters of Sabra and the terrorism of Arafat. Beyond the insighful analysis of the political climate of Lebanon that no democratic power is apt to understand, the display of the way the people deal with these problems: the shellings, the street fights, the car bombs is an excellent psychological picture. Most important, however, is objectivity is in the juxtaposition of counterbalancing Middle Eastern myths: Israeli pioneering kibbutznic and Palestinian guerilla hero. Apart from what many say he blames arafat, not the Israeli's for failing to accept peace offers and destroying the prospects of his people by feeding them with false hope. He also, though, dissects the willingness of the modern Jewish settlers and their feeling of ownership. It is neither one-sided nor partisan, it is reality pure and simple. Until we accept this book, we will never solve the problem of Palestinian authority beause we do not understand the problem. (Previous comments denouncing the books mention respectively: that he says Jews were expelled from 'Palestine 2000 years ago' Granted the timing is slightly off but Jewish Diaspora's accepted starting point was the destruction of the Second Temple and the area was generically known to the people as Palestine - but the point his moot and irrelevant anyway. As to the understanding of Jewish historical/biblical claims it is very well handeled as he goes through the four Jewish groups in Israel. Lastly, it does not unnecessarily vilify the arab world or the palestinian masses. Nor oes it begrudge Israel her right to secure her borders. Rather it displays the horror of terrorism and destruction on both sides. The terrorists are wrong, but are the secretive kidnapping really right? I will not say, but the question is posed well and in clear context.)It is valuable to lend context, personal perspective, inside analysis and open up new areas of thought.