DELIVERY & GIFT DETAILS:
Usually ships within 24 hours
Delivery Time and Shipping Rates
Eligible for gift wrap & gift message.

Reserve it at BN.com & pick it up in 60 minutes at your local store.
Enter a zip code
(Paperback - Reprint)
| More Formats | |
|---|---|
| Available in eBook | $12.00 |
| Hardcover | $23.75 |
| Paperback - Large Print Edition - Large Print | $13.95 |
| Compact Disc - Unabridged, 12 CDs, 15 hours | $37.99 |
From a writer “of near-miraculous perfection” (The New York Times Book Review) and “a literary intelligence far surpassing most other writers of her generation” (San Francisco Chronicle), The Emperor’s Children is a dazzling, masterful novel about the intersections in the lives of three friends, now on the cusp of their thirties, making their way—and not—in New York City.
There is beautiful, sophisticated Marina Thwaite—an “It” girl finishing her first book; the daughter of Murray Thwaite, celebrated intellectual and journalist—and her two closest friends from Brown, Danielle, a quietly appealing television producer, and Julius, a cash-strapped freelance critic. The delicious complications that arise among them become dangerous when Murray’s nephew, Frederick “Bootie” Tubb, an idealistic college dropout determined to make his mark, comes to town. As the skies darken, it is Bootie’s unexpected decisions—and their stunning, heartbreaking outcome—that will change each of their lives forever.
A richly drawn, brilliantly observed novel of fate and fortune—of innocence and experience, seduction and self-invention; of ambition, including literary ambition; of glamour, disaster, and promise—The Emperor’s Children is a tour de force that brings to life a city, a generation, and the way we live in this moment.
We've all caught glimpses of them before, but Claire Messud has captured and pinned under glass members of a striking subspecies of the modern age: the smart, sophisticated, anxious young people who think of themselves as the cultural elite. Trained for greatness in the most prestigious universities, these shiny liberal arts graduates emerge with expensive tastes, the presumption of entitlement and no real economic prospects whatsoever. If you're one of them or if you can't resist the delicious pleasure of pitying them, you'll relish every page of The Emperor's Children.
More Reviews and RecommendationsClaire Messud was educated at Cambridge and Yale. Her novels, When the World Was Steady and The Hunters were both finalists for the PEN/Faulkner Award; her second novel, The Last Life, was a Publishers Weekly Best Book of the Year and Editor's Choice at The Village Voice. All three of her books were New York Times Notable Books of the Year. She has been awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship and a Radcliffe Fellowship, and is the current recipient of the Strauss Living Award from the American Academy of Arts and Letters. She lives in Somerville, Massachusetts, with her husband and children.
Author biography courtesy of Random House
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
August 01, 2009: Claire Messud is a brilliant writer with great descriptive powers. She has crafted a snapshot of several months in the lives a group of friends living in New York City. The problem for the reader is being able to care about any of these dysfunctional characters enough to make the book rise above the tediousness of their self-centered lives.
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
June 22, 2009: The book was long-winded and went slowly for the first half of the book and it became engrossing in the last half. If the author could have more quickly engaged the reader in the beginning it could have been a good book.
Name:
Claire Messud
Current Home:
Somerville, MA, USA
Place of Birth:
Greenwich, CT, USA
Education:
BA in Comparative Literature, Yale University, 1987, MA in English Literature, Jesus College, Cambridge University, 1989
Claire Messud was educated at Cambridge and Yale. Her novels, When the World Was Steady and The Hunters were both finalists for the PEN/Faulkner Award; her second novel, The Last Life, was a Publishers Weekly Best Book of the Year and Editor's Choice at The Village Voice. All three of her books were New York Times Notable Books of the Year. She has been awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship and a Radcliffe Fellowship, and is the current recipient of the Strauss Living Award from the American Academy of Arts and Letters. She lives in Somerville, Massachusetts, with her husband and children.
Author biography courtesy of Random House
1. As a child in Australia, I wore a school uniform that included a hat on my head and the color of my underpants. If you had long hair, you had to wear it up, with grey ribbons. You weren't allowed to take your hat off in public, or to eat in public in uniform. It all sounds very draconian, but I loved it. I think my abiding interest in knowing rules, and breaking them, comes from those early days. I'm a big believer in rules - like grammar, for example. If you know the rules of grammar, it's fine to break them. If you don't know the rules, and break them by mistake, people can usually tell...
2. We have, in our family, a dachshund named Myshkin. She's middle aged, short-haired, red and a little portly, but very delicious, with soulful eyes. It may not seem kind to have named her after Prince Myshkin, the protagonist of Dostoevksy's THE IDIOT; but she's an idiot in the best possible sense: an innocent. There's no guile in her. That said, she's spectacularly greedy, and only last night grabbed a piece of sushi off my husband's plate when he wasn't looking. When I was a child, we had two dachshunds, uncle and nephew, named Big and Small. They were quite particular and temperamental, which I thought was great. When we were looking for a dog, I persuaded my reluctant husband that we should have a dachshund by pointing out that as a breed, they were crabby and discriminating - as well as animals which, on account of their physiques, have a strong understanding of the absurdity of life. As it turned out, Myshkin is a complete pushover, as undiscriminating as they come, and stops and wags her tail for strangers in the street.
3. I don't keep a diary. I believe, in principle, that one should; but after re-reading 10 year old entries in horror, and discovering that my reflections and preoccupations had changed not at all in the course of my entire adult life, I gave up writing any of it down about ten years ago. Now, like my grandfather before me, I'm more likely to note what I had for dinner or what the weather was like in the margins of my date-book than I am to spill forth my innermost thoughts. I'm not sure, at this point, that I have any innermost thoughts.
What are your ten favorite books, and what makes them special to you?
My goodness - as above, it seems impossible to whittle down the great library of books I've loved to a mere ten. The trouble with lists is that they're always about what's being left out. But here are a few that come to mind...in no particular order:
ZENO'S CONSCIENCE by Italo Svevo - because its absurd dark humor seems to me to capture something very true about life; and its slightly meandering, lumpy structure delights me, who am the sort of person who makes tidy piles of everything.
THE PORTRAIT OF A LADY by Henry James - because I've loved it since first I read it, and loved it completely differently upon rereading it. I'm entranced by James's understanding of the human heart, enthralled by the capaciousness and ultimate clarity of his sentences, and a sucker for his melodramatic plots.
ANNA KARENINA by Leo Tolstoy - as above, because I've loved it every time I've read it. Because I have a terrible memory, but scenes from this novel, and even small details, stay with me over time with intense vividness. Nobody can choose the significant detail like Tolstoy; and nobody understands better the intertwining of the banal and the profound. I think of the moment when Kitty comes to visit Anna, and notices that Anna's maid has a more stylish hairdo than Kitty does herself: it's a small, vain thing for her to notice, but it's so true, and it speaks volumes.
DANCE TO THE MUSIC OF TIME by Anthony Powell - why pick one book, when you can get 12 for the price of one? I remember reading sections of this epic aloud to my sister, and we laughed so hard we had tears running down our faces. When we stopped laughing, she said "Doesn't it seem a little strange to write 12 volumes of something quite so...light?" The fact is, Powell's touch is light, but also piercingly true, with the result that he captures an entire British class and generation with the precision of a Leica. And, of course, there's the laughing...
THE COLLECTED STORIES OF ALICE MUNRO - If you haven't read Alice Munro, then I can't explain to you what is so perfect about her work. If you have read her, you don't need me to tell you. Her vision is dark, but of a crystalline clarity. It has been said of her - perhaps by Cynthia Ozick? - that she is our Chekhov; and it's absolutely true. She chronicles, without show or fuss, the lives of ordinary Canadians; she knows her world to bedrock, and her people to their innermost core. And she writes with a startling, beautiful lucidity.
MADAME BOVARY by Gustave Flaubert - Ah, you knew it had to be among the ten. Because I, who have such a terrible memory, have so many impeccably detailed scenes from this book emblazoned in my mind; and because the tragic banality of Emma's story reflects so poignantly the tenor of so many of our bourgeois lives. Because Gustave knew that specificity was all; and knew, too, as he once said, that the writer must be in his work as God is in nature: everywhere but invisible.
THE LOSER by Thomas Bernhard. You may think this crabby Austrian is unapproachable - and he wants you to think so, with his long sentences, his refusal to paragraph, his hectoring narrators, and, in some cases, his whopping tomes. But there are a number of less daunting Bernhard volumes, and THE LOSER is one of them. It's about a failed musician who studied alongside Glenn Gould, and in so doing realized that being terrific isn't enough, if you're not a genius. It's about ambition, and failure, and how you create a sense of self, and what happens when you fail to do so, or can do so only in relation to someone else. It's black, but funny, and so very true. I'd also recommend WITTGENSTEIN'S NEPHEW, while I'm at it.
BUDDENBROOKS by Thomas Mann. I grant that there are a lot of 19th century novels on this list. It's because I love the fullness of them, and the richness of them, and because, somehow,l they must have formed my idea of what a novel is. I'm a great believer in pleasure, as a reader, and learning about people, and about society, is to me a great pleasure. In BUDDENBROOKS, written when Mann was alarmingly young (25, maybe?), he provides a fabulous portrait not only of a grand family in decline, but of the world they inhabit, too. And it relates to all sorts of other books I love, too - Fontane's EFFIE BRIEST, and by extension, weirdly, to Beckett's play KRAPP'S LAST TAPE. Go figure.
OSCAR & LUCINDA by Peter Carey - I read and loved this book when it came out twenty years ago, and then read it again to teach it, more recently. The first reading transformed me into a die-hard Peter Carey fan, and upon rereading I knew why: because nobody creates fully imagined, slightly fantastical, completely absorbing worlds in the way that Carey can. It is like entering a marvelous dream; or rather, in this case, two marvelous dreams that conjoin, eventually. And although the ending is sad, it's also extraordinary, and beautiful, and funny - so much so, that you'd be forgiven for forgetting, for a moment, that it's sad.
IN A FREE STATE by V.S.Naipaul - Okay, it's a toss-up for me whether I choose A HOUSE FOR MR. BISWAS, or IN A FREE STATE, by Naipaul. They're very different in tone -- Biswas is a black comedy, tender and delightful, of a rare compassion for its hapless protagonist. IN A FREE STATE, which is a novella and stories, is a much darker book. But the novella that lends the book its title is remarkable in its deft efficiency, in its vividness and complexity. It is, in its form, perfect and forceful - and again, searingly memorable.
What types of music do you like? Is there any particular kind you like to listen to when you're writing?
I don't listen to music when I'm writing, or not on purpose. I have pretty eclectic tastes, and perhaps because my husband has tremendous musical knowledge, I'm always aware of being an amateur. But I love Chopin and Debussy in particular, and I've listened to The Who since I was 10 years old, and I have particular affection for The Eurythmics and Annie Lennox. I'm also a great sentimentalist, and a fan of Edith Piaf and Charles Aznavour and Jacques Brel. I like Amy Winehouse, on the newer front. Earlier this year, I heard a Pulp song called "Common People", about 10 years after it was a hit, and played it over & over for weeks, as if I were 15 years old.
If you had a book club, what would it be reading -- and why?
If I had a book club, it would be to prompt me to read books that I wish I'd already read, or feel the need to talk about with other people. Because of that, I think I'd have a book club that read classics, and literary biographies. I might start with Tristram Shandy, because I've tried on my own at least 5 times and never managed to get to the end. I'd be hoping that peer pressure would force the issue. And if that worked, we might move on to Finnegan's Wake.
What are your favorite kinds of books to give -- and get -- as gifts?
Books that I love, or that the person giving me the book, loves. A book like that is a very personal gift - it's like passing on a small piece of your soul. We all love different books, because they speak to us personally, in a particular moment in our lives, or because of some detail about our histories; and in giving them to someone, we're sharing a great intimacy. That doesn't at all mean that the book will affect the recipient in the same way, of course; but the sharing itself is a kind of trust, and an adventure.
Do you have any special writing rituals? For example, what do you have on your desk when you're writing?
In some ways, I'm pretty flexible about the whole thing - I can write in a café, if the music isn't too loud, & I can write very happily in bed, or on the sofa or at the dining room table. My desk is in fact the place I'm least likely to write. I'm very particular, though, about the pens I use, and the paper. I always write on French graph paper - usually Rhodia pads, the kind with yellow card covers; and I use a black felt tip with a very fine point. With the right pen & the right paper, I'm all set.
What are you working on now?
That'd be telling.
Many writers are hardly "overnight success" stories. How long did it take foryou to get where you are today? Any rejection-slip horror stories or inspirational anecdotes?
I've been writing since I was a child, but I wrote my first novel - When The World Was Steady - in my early and mid-twenties. I was living in Britain at the time, and the book was first published there - I was very lucky, I think, to be living in the UK, where editors actually answered your correspondence, and even spoke to you on the phone, sometimes. I don't imagine I would've been published at all, if I'd been in the USA. My first novel was published in a very old-fashioned way - a tiny advance, no expectations, a few reviews, no sales. It was a blessing; but also made me realize that publication, while wonderful, changed very little in my life. I still needed to earn a living, most people still thought I was simply unemployed, and my sister-in-law told me, for years, that I was just jealous of J.K. Rowling. There seemed little point trying to explain that I wasn't trying to write Harry Potter books.
I think one of the most inspiring moments, for me, along the way, was the day on which my agent had hoped for an auction of one of my novels, but none of the ten publishers was interested. He is a man of great wisdom and experience, and has been the agent to far, far more significant writers than me - to many of the greats of the last century, in fact. On that day, he said to me, very calmly, "Ah, but Beckett was also very hard to sell." Even to have him suggest, in the most oblique terms, that I was engaged in the same enterprise as Beckett, made it all okay. It reminded me that it's not about the publishers, or the money, or the sales - it's about the work itself. And I'm sure Beckett was very hard to sell, too.
What tips or advice do you have for writers still looking to be discovered?
Don't look to be discovered, would be my advice. Don't worry about the other folks. Write what you have to write, with as much honesty, passion, and skill as you possibly can; and then leave it up to the world to discover you or not. Because you can spend your whole life trying to please other people in the hope of achieving some kind of success, and never achieve it; and then all you will have done is betrayed your own vision and your happiness. I always think of Schopenhauer, whose masterpiece THE WORLD AS WILL & REPRESENTATION was published to no acclaim at all - indeed, to no attention at all. He spent the next thirty-five years certain that his moment would come; and eventually, indeed, it did. If it hadn't, we might think he was a madman or a loser; but the fact is, he would always have remained true to himself and to his vision; and you can't hope for more than that.
The poised beauty of Messud’s prose -- neat, clean, and incisive -- permeates this novel of manners about Ivy Leagueeducated New Yorkers familiar with wealth and influence. The author's perspective offers the reader a detailed X-ray and a panoramic view of a tragedy that the characters can see unfolding along with the reader. Infused throughout with surprise and suspense, this is a superb novel by a literary virtuoso.
From a writer “of near-miraculous perfection” (The New York Times Book Review) and “a literary intelligence far surpassing most other writers of her generation” (San Francisco Chronicle), The Emperor’s Children is a dazzling, masterful novel about the intersections in the lives of three friends, now on the cusp of their thirties, making their way—and not—in New York City.
There is beautiful, sophisticated Marina Thwaite—an “It” girl finishing her first book; the daughter of Murray Thwaite, celebrated intellectual and journalist—and her two closest friends from Brown, Danielle, a quietly appealing television producer, and Julius, a cash-strapped freelance critic. The delicious complications that arise among them become dangerous when Murray’s nephew, Frederick “Bootie” Tubb, an idealistic college dropout determined to make his mark, comes to town. As the skies darken, it is Bootie’s unexpected decisions—and their stunning, heartbreaking outcome—that will change each of their lives forever.
A richly drawn, brilliantly observed novel of fate and fortune—of innocence and experience, seduction and self-invention; of ambition, including literary ambition; of glamour, disaster, and promise—The Emperor’s Children is a tour de force that brings to life a city, a generation, and the way we live in this moment.
We've all caught glimpses of them before, but Claire Messud has captured and pinned under glass members of a striking subspecies of the modern age: the smart, sophisticated, anxious young people who think of themselves as the cultural elite. Trained for greatness in the most prestigious universities, these shiny liberal arts graduates emerge with expensive tastes, the presumption of entitlement and no real economic prospects whatsoever. If you're one of them or if you can't resist the delicious pleasure of pitying them, you'll relish every page of The Emperor's Children.
In tracing each of these characters’ trajectories, Ms. Messud does a nimble, quicksilver job of portraying her central characters from within and without — showing us their pretensions, frailties and self-delusions, even as she delineates their secret yearnings and fears. At the same time, she uses their stories to explore many of the same questions she explicated so masterfully in The Last Life questions about how an individual hammers out an identity of his or her own under the umbrella of a powerful family, questions about the ways in which people mythologize their own lives and the lives of those they love.
Marina Thwaite, Danielle Minkoff and Julian Clarke were buddies at Brown, certain that they would soon do something important in the world. But as all near 30, Danielle is struggling as a TV documentary maker, and Julius is barely surviving financially as a freelance critic. Marina, the startlingly beautiful daughter of celebrated social activist, journalist and hob-nobber Murray Thwaite, is living with her parents on the Upper West Side, unable to finish her book-titled The Emperor's Children Have No Clothes (on how changing fashions in children's clothes mirror changes in society). Two arrivals upset the group stasis: Ludovic, a fiercely ambitious Aussie who woos Marina to gain entr e into society (meanwhile planning to destroy Murray's reputation), and Murray's nephew, Frederick "Bootie" Tubb, an immature, idealistic college dropout and autodidact who is determined to live the life of a New York intellectual. The group orbits around the post-September 11 city with disconcerting entitlement-and around Murray, who is, in a sense, the emperor. Messud, in her fourth novel, remains wickedly observant of pretensions-intellectual, sexual, class and gender. Her writing is so fluid, and her plot so cleverly constructed, that events seem inevitable, yet the narrative is ultimately surprising and masterful as a contemporary comedy of manners. 100,00 announced first printing; author tour. (Sept. 4) Copyright 2006 Reed Business Information.
Beautiful, Ivy League-educated, and the daughter of a renowned journalist, Marina Thwaite lives in New York City along with two close friends from Brown: television producer Danielle and freelance writer Julius, who is gay. All three are just barely 30 and making their way into adulthood. Marina has recently broken up with a longtime lover she thought she might marry and is struggling to finish a book whose advance is long spent. Meanwhile, Danielle is returning from an investigative trip to Australia, and Julius is trying to figure out how to make ends meet without admitting to his friends that he's flat broke. Enter Marina's young cousin, Bootie, a college dropout who's decided that life in New York City has got to be better than life in upstate New York. Bootie's arrival in the city is a catalyst for events that will change all their lives forever. Messud's (The Hunters) comedy of manners is extremely well written and features characters that come alive. The reader will be tugged in many directions as these characters' lives intersect in the realms of love, family, friendship, and tragedy. This wonderful read is an insightful look at our time and the decisions people make. Highly recommended. [See Prepub Alert, LJ 5/1/06.]-Robin Nesbitt, Columbus Metropolitan Lib., OH Copyright 2006 Reed Business Information.
A stinging portrait of life among Manhattan's junior glitterati. In March 2001, a decade after they met at Brown, three best friends are finding it hard to be 30. Danielle Minkoff is the most established, although her job in TV news largely entails cranking out puff pieces on the dangers of, say, liposuction. Freelance critic Julius Clarke wonders how much longer a hip social life can substitute for a regular income. They're both strivers from the Midwest, while Marina Thwaite was born into the liberal elite: Father Murray is a crusading journalist, mom Annabel a dedicated social worker. But beautiful Marina is floundering, at sea in the book she's supposedly writing, about children's clothing, living with her parents after the breakup of a long-time romance. Their uneasy stasis is disrupted by two new arrivals. Australian Ludovic Seeley, funded by a Murdoch-like mogul to edit a new magazine, The Monitor, latches onto Marina, giving her the confidence to finish her manuscript as well as its glib title, The Emperor's Children Have No Clothes. College dropout Bootie Tubb, the 19-year-old son of Murray's sister, arrives from Watertown, N.Y., hoping to learn from his famous uncle how to be an intellectual. Bootie is swiftly disillusioned-unsurprisingly, since Murray's self-absorption is surpassed only by that of his daughter, one of the most narcissistic characters in recent fiction. Messud (The Hunters, 2001, etc.) deftly paints the neurotic uncertainties of people who know they're privileged and feel sorry for themselves anyway; she makes her characters human enough so we don't entirely detest them, but overall, they're a distasteful bunch. In this shallow world, theenigmatic but clearly malevolent Ludovic is bound to succeed, even though The Monitor's launch is scuttled by the attack on the World Trade Center. It's a bit disconcerting to find 9/11 so smoothly integrated into the author's thematic concerns and plot development-it believably motivates the breakup of Murray's affair with Danielle-but five years on, perhaps it's time for this catastrophe to enter the realm of worthy fictional material. Intelligent, evocative and unsparing.
Loading...1. At the novel’s onset, most of the characters are outside New York: Danielle in Australia, pursuing an idea for a story and finding someone to have a crush on; Marina at her parents’ summer house in Stockbridge, accompanied by Julius; and Bootie in his mother’s house in upstate New York. Why might Messud have chosen to begin in this manner? At what other points in the book do the characters leave the city and with what results?
2. Messud introduces her characters through their environments: the womblike bathroom where Bootie soaks in hot water and serious literature; the Thwaites’ resplendent Central Park West apartment; and Danielle’s pristine, aesthetically climate-controlled studio. What do these spaces tell us about their occupants? Why might the author have used this rather old-fashioned way of ushering us into a novel set in 2001? Where else does she employ the techniques of an earlier age of literature?
3. Which of the novel’s characters strikes you as its moral center? Is it Bootie, who comes to New York with such high ideals and easily rankled feelings? Is it Danielle, who has lived there long enough to feel at home there but who still sees its pretensions and absurdities? With which of these characters is the reader meant to identify? Whose judgments seem the most reliable? And what flaws or blind spots afflict even him or her?
4. Julius is obsessed with the characters of Pierre and Natasha from War and Peace, longing to be the sparkling Natasha but fearing he’s really more like the brooding, self-conscious Pierre. Bootie is constantly reading Emerson. Which of the other characters has an emblematicbook, and what role do those books play in their lives, in the way they see the world, and, of course, the way they see themselves? Is Julius anything like Pierre or Natasha? Does Bootie really live up to Emerson’s criterion of genius? At what points do they similarly misread other characters?
5. In addition to reading, many of Messud’s people are also engaged in writing: Marina has her book-in-progress and Murray has his (which he’s thinking of calling How to Live), and Bootie has his essay on Murray (and Murray’s book). What is their relationship to their writing? What do they hope to achieve through it? How do other characters respond to it? Does Messud give us any indication as to which of these characters’ work is good (or genuine) and which is failed or fraudulent?
6. Almost everybody in The Emperor’s Children envies, and is intimidated by, somebody else. Julius, for instance, is in awe of Marina’s self-confidence and envious of her sense of entitlement. Marina is cowed by her father. And poor Bootie is a virtual pressure cooker of indiscriminate awe and resentment. What sort of things do Messud’s characters feel insecure about? Is there anyone in the book who seems truly comfortable with him or herself or any relationship that seems to be conducted by equals? Would you say that awe and envy are this novel’s dominant emotions?
7. Marina, we learn, frequently accompanies Murray to public functions, and is sometimes mistaken for his “trophy wife.” [35] Does their relationship strike you as incestuous (in which case it’s a brilliant stroke of Messud to make Ludovic call her “her father’s Anna Freud [110]”)? Compare Marina’s unfolding relationship with Ludovic to her bond with her father. Do you think that Ludovic–incidentally, the only major character who is seen entirely from the outside, through the eyes of others–really loves Marina or is merely using her, and if so for what purpose?
8. Just as Marina has symbolically taken over her mother’s role, “Danielle had the peculiar sensation of having usurped her friend’s role in the Thwaite family, and more than that, of having usurped it at some moment in the distant past, a decade or more ago: she felt like a teenager. . . , and she was suddenly, powerfully aware of the profound oddity of Marina’s present life, a life arrested at, or at least returned to, childhood.” [41] How many of the other characters seem similarly suspended? Which of them seems like a full-grown adult, and what does it mean to be an adult in the scheme of this novel? If Danielle has indeed usurped Marina’s place, what is the significance of her affair with Marina’s father? Which of the other characters takes on another character’s role, and for what reasons?
9. When pressed to take a job, Marina confesses, “I worry that that will make me ordinary, like everybody else.” [67] To what extent are other characters possessed by the same fear, and how do they defend themselves against it? Do they have a common idea of what constitutes ordinariness? Can ordinariness even exist in a social world in which everyone is constantly, feverishly striving to be unique? Is it possible that Marina is just lazy and prevaricating in her charming way?
10. With his high-flown ambitions, his indolence, and his appalling sense of hygiene, Bootie initially seems like a comic character. But in the course of the novel Messud’s portrait of him darkens until he comes to seem either sinister or tragic–perhaps both. How does she accomplish this? Which other characters does she gradually reveal in a different light? Compare Messud’s shifting portrayal of Bootie to her handling of Julius and Danielle. In what ways do they too evade or defy the reader’s initial expectations about them?
11. Ludovic repeatedly declares that he wants to make a revolution with his magazine The Monitor, but what is the magazine supposed to be about? Lest we think that The Emperor’s Children is merely a satire of the New York media, what other highly touted ideas in this novel turn out to be light on substance, and what does this suggest about the value of ideas at this historical moment?
12. On similar lines, both Ludovic and Bootie denounce Murray as a fraud while Bootie in particular prides himself on his sincerity. But is such sincerity a good thing? What other characters embrace that virtue, and with what results? Compare Bootie’s frank literary assessment of his uncle with Murray’s frank critique of his daughter’s manuscript, or his even franker response to Bootie’s essay. When in this novel does honesty turn out to be a pretext for something else? And when do subterfuge and deception turn out to be acts of kindness?
13. Murray feels that his mother’s efforts at improving him succeeded only in “turning her boy into someone, something, she couldn’t understand.” [123] By contrast, he thinks, Marina has been paralyzed by the very expansiveness of her upbringing. What does this novel have to say about parents and children? Which of the Emperor’s children has proved a disappointment to his or her parents? Does any parent in this novel (Murray, Annabel, Judy, Randy) truly understand his or her offspring? And is it good for said offspring to be understood?
14. Some of Messud’s characters begin the novel in a state of happiness and others attain it, but nearly all of them see their happiness threatened or even shattered. How does this come about? Which of them is the victim of outside forces and which is responsible for his or her fall? How would you describe this novel’s vision of happiness? Considering that the typical comedy has a happy (or happy-ish) ending, what do you make of the fact that so many of Messud’s characters end up bereft or disappointed?
15. Among this novel’s many characters, one has to include the character of New York City. How does Messud bring the city to life? Compare Murray’s New York with Marina’s and Danielle’s, Bootie’s and Julius’s. What is it that draws a Bootie Tubb and a Julius Clarke, a Danielle Minkoff and a Ludovic Seeley to prove themselves in New York?
16. What role do the events of September 11, 2001, play in The Emperor’s Children? Are there other points when history–or, put another way, reality–impinges on the safe and mostly privileged world its characters inhabit? What is the significance of Annabel Thwaite’s client DeVaughn or results of Julius and David’s affair? Does the ending make sense when compared with the rest of the novel?
Our Chef Is Very Famous in London
Darlings! Welcome! And you must be Danielle?" Sleek and small, her wide eyes rendered enormous by kohl, Lucy Leverett, in spite of her resemblance to a baby seal, rasped impressively. Her dangling fan earrings clanked at her neck as she leaned in to kiss each of them, Danielle too, and although she held her cigarette, in its mother-of-pearl holder, at arm's length, its smoke wafted between them and brought tears to Danielle's eyes.
Danielle didn't wipe them, for fear of disturbing her makeup. Having spent half an hour putting on her face in front of the grainy mirror of Moira and John's bathroom, ogling her imperfections and applying vigorous remedial spackle--beneath which her weary, olive-shaped eyes were pouched by bluish bags, the curves of her nostrils oddly red, and her high forehead peeling--she had no intention of revealing to strangers the disintegration beneath her paint.
"Come in, darlings, come in." Lucy moved behind them and herded the trio toward the party. The Leveretts' living room was painted a deep purple--aubergine, in local parlance--and its windows were draped with velvet. From the ceiling hung a brutal wrought iron chandelier, like something salvaged from a medieval castle. Three men loitered by the bay window, talking to one another while staring outat the street, their glasses of red wine luminous in the reflected evening light. A long, plump, pillowed sofa stretched the length of one wall, and upon it four women were disposed like odalisques in a harem. Two occupied opposite ends of the divan, their legs tucked under, their extended arms caressing the cushions, while between them one rested her head upon another's lap, and smiling, eyes closed, whispered to the ceiling while her friend stroked her abundant hair. The whole effect was, for Danielle, faintly cloudy, as if she had walked into someone else's dream. She kept feeling this, in Sydney, so far from home: she couldn't quite say it wasn't real, but it certainly wasn't her reality.
"Rog? Rog, more wine!" Lucy called to the innards of the house, then turned again to her guests, a proprietorial arm on Danielle's bicep. "Red or white? He's probably even got pink, if you're after it. Can't bear it myself--so California." She grinned, and from her crows' feet, Danielle knew she was forty, or almost.
Two men bearing bottles emerged from the candlelit gloom of the dining room, both slender, both at first glance slightly fey. Danielle took the imposing one in front, in a pressed lavender shirt and with, above hooded eyes, a high, smooth Nabokovian brow, to be her host. She extended a hand. "I'm Danielle." His fingers were elegant, and his palm, when it pressed hers, was cool.
"Are you now?" he said.
The other man, at least a decade older, slightly snaggletoothed and goateed, spoke from behind his shoulder. "I'm Roger," he said. "Good to see you. Don't mind Ludo, he's playing hard to get."
"Ludovic Seeley," Lucy offered. "Danielle--"
"Minkoff."
"Moira and John's friend. From New York."
"New York," Ludovic Seeley repeated. "I'm moving there next month."
"Red or white?" asked Roger, whose open shirt revealed a tanned breast dotted with sparse gray hairs and divided by a narrow gold chain.
"Red, please."
"Good choice," said Seeley, almost in a whisper. He was--she could feel it rather than see it, because his hooded eyes did not so much as flicker--looking her up and down. She hoped that her makeup was properly mixed in, that no clump of powder had gathered dustily upon her chin or cheek.
The moment of recognition was, for Danielle, instantaneous. Here, of all places, in this peculiar and irrelevant enclave, she had spotted a familiar. She wondered if he, too, experienced it: the knowledge that this mattered. Ludovic Seeley: she did not know who he was, and yet she felt she knew him, or had been waiting for him. It was not merely his physical presence, the long, feline slope of him, a quality at once loose and controlled, as if he played with the illusion of looseness. Nor was it the timbre of his voice, deep and yet not particularly resonant, its Australian inflection so slight as to be almost British. It was, she decided, something in his face: he knew. Although what he knew she could not have said. There were the eyes, a surprising deep and gold-flecked gray, their lines slightly downturned in an expression both mournful and amused, and the particular small furrow that cut into his right cheek when he smiled even slightly. His ears, pinned close to his head, lent him a tidy aspect; his dark hair, so closely shaven as to allow the blue of his scalp to shine through, emphasized both his irony and his restraint. His skin was pale, almost as pale as Danielle's own, and his nose a fine, sharp stretch of cartilage. His face, so distinctive, struck her as that of a nineteenth-century portrait, a Sargent perhaps, an embodiment of sardonic wisdom and society, of aristocratic refinement. And yet in the fall of his shirt, the line of his torso, the graceful but not unmanly movement of his slender fingers (and yes, discreetly, but definitely there, he had hair on the backs of his hands--she held to it, as a point of attraction: men ought not to be hairless), he was distinctly of the present. What he knew, perhaps, was what he wanted.
"Come on, darling." Lucy took her by the elbow. "Let's introduce you to the rest of the gang."
This, dinner at the Leveretts', was Danielle's last evening in Sydney before heading home. In the morning, she would board the plane and sleep, sleep her way back to yesterday, or by tomorrow, to today, in New York. She'd been away a week, researching a possible television program, with the help of her friend Moira. It wouldn't be filmed for months, if it were filmed at all, a program about the relationship between the Aborigines and their government, the formal apologies and amends of recent years. The idea was to explore the possibility of reparations to African Americans--a high-profile professor was publishing a book about it--through the Australian prism. It wasn't clear even to Danielle whether this could fly. Could an American audience care less about the Aborigines? Were the situations even comparable? The week had been filled with meetings and bluster, the zealous singing exchanges of her business, the pretense of certainty where in fact there was none at all. Moira firmly believed it could be done, that it should be done; but Danielle was not convinced.
Sydney was a long way from home. For a week, in her pleasant waft of alienation, Danielle had indulged the fantasy of another possible life--Moira, after all, had left New York for Sydney only two years before--and with it, another future. She rarely considered a life elsewhere; the way, she supposed, with faint incredulity, most people never considered a life in New York. From her bedroom in her friends' lacy tin-roofed row house at the end of a shady street in Balmain, Danielle could see the water. Not the great sweep of the harbor, with its arcing bridge, nor the ruffled seagull's wings of the opera house, but a placid stretch of blue beyond the park below, rippled by the wake of occasional ferries and winking in the early evening sunlight.
Early autumn in Sydney, it was still bitter at home. Small, brightly colored birds clustered in the jacaranda trees, trilling their joyous disharmonies. In earliest morning, she had glimpsed, against a dawn-dappled shrub in the backyard, an enormous dew-soaked spiderweb, its intricacies sparkling, and poised, at its edge, an enormous furry spider. Nature was in the city, here. It was another world. She had imagined watching her 747 soar away without her, a new life beginning.
But not really. She was a New Yorker. There was, for Danielle Minkoff, only New York. Her work was there, her friends were there--even her remote acquaintances from college at Brown ten years ago were there--and she had made her home in the cacophonous, cozy comfort of the Village. From her studio in its bleached-brick high-rise at Sixth Avenue and Twelfth Street, she surveyed lower Manhattan like a captain at the prow of her ship. Beleaguered and poor though she sometimes felt, or craving an interruption in the sea of asphalt and iron, a silence in the tide of chatter, she couldn't imagine giving it up. Sometimes she joked to her mother--raised, as she herself had been, in Columbus, Ohio, and now a resident of Florida--that they'd have to carry her out feet first. There was no place like New York. And Australia, in comparison, was, well, Oz.
This last supper in Sydney was a purely social event. Where the Leveretts lived seemed like an area in which one or two ungentrified Aboriginal people might still linger, gray-haired and bleary, outside the pub at the end of the road: people who, pint in hand, hadn't accepted the government's apology and moved on. Or perhaps not, perhaps Danielle was merely imagining the area, its residents, as they had once been: for a second glance at the BMWs and Audis lining the curb suggested that the new Sydney (like the new New York) had already, and eagerly, edged its way in.
Moira was friendly with Lucy Leverett, who owned a small but influential gallery down at The Rocks that specialized in Aboriginal art. Her husband, Roger, was a novelist. As John parked the car outside the Leveretts' large Victorian row house, Moira had explained, "Lucy's great. She's done a lot on the art scene here. And if you want to meet Aboriginal artists, to talk to them for the film, she's your woman."
"And he?"
"Well"--John had pulled a rueful moue--"his novels are no bloody good--"
"But we like him," Moira finished firmly.
"I'll give him this much, he's got great taste in wine."
"Roger's lovely," Moira insisted. "And it's true about his books, but he's very powerful here in Sydney. He could really help you, if you needed him."
"Roger Leverett?" Danielle thought a moment. "I've never heard of him."
"Not surprised."
"As in 'our chef is very famous in London.' "
"Come again?"
"There's a nasty-looking little Chinese restaurant in the East Village with a handwritten sign in the window--a dirty window, too--that says 'our chef is very famous in London.' But not in New York, or anywhere else outside of London."
"And probably not in London either, eh?" John had said, as they approached the Leveretts' front door.
"Roger Leverett is very famous in Sydney, sweetheart, whatever you say."
At supper--prawns and quails' eggs with squid-ink noodles, followed by emu, which closely resembled steak and which she had to force herself to eat--Danielle sat between Roger and a beautiful Asian boy--Ito? Iko?--who was the boyfriend of an older architect named Gary at the other end of the table. Ludovic Seeley sat next to Moira, his arm languidly and familiarly draped over the back of her chair, and he leaned in to speak to her as though confiding secrets. Danielle glanced over every so often, unable to stop herself, but did not once, until the passion fruit sorbet was before them, find him looking her way. When he did, his spectacular eyes seemed again amused, and they did not waver. It was she who lowered her gaze, shifting in her chair and feigning sudden interest in Ito/Iko's recent trip to Tahiti.
The evening now seemed to her an elaborate theater, the sole purpose of which was meeting Ludovic Seeley. That anyone could care for Lucy or Roger or Gary or Ito/Iko in the way Danielle cared for her friends in New York seemed almost implausible: these people, to her, were actors. Only Ludovic was, in his intimate whisperings and unbroken glances, very real. Whatever that meant. Reality, or rather, facing it, was Danielle's great credo; although if she were wholly honest, here and now, she believed a little in magic, too.
Roger, beside her, was jovial and solicitous. Mostly, Danielle felt her host was a narcissist, delighted by the sound of his own voice and the humor of his own jokes, and by the pipe he fiddled with and sucked upon between courses. He was generous with the red wine, more so to her and himself than to those farther afield, and he grew more positively loquacious with each glass.
"Been to McLaren Vale? Not this time? When do you leave? Ah, well then. Next time, promise me you'll get to South Australia, do the wine route. And there's great scuba diving off the coast. Been scuba diving? No, well, I can see you might be intimidated. I used to do a lot of diving in my day, but you can get yourself in some very nasty situations, very nasty indeed. About twenty years ago--I wasn't much older than you are now--how old are you? Thirty? Well, you don't look it, my girl. Such fine skin. It must be those fine Jewish genes--you are Jewish, aren't you? Yes, well, anyway, the Reef. I was up diving with some mates, this is before Lucy, she'd never let me do it now. I was living up near Brisbane, finishing my second novel--Revelation Road, you probably don't know it? No, well, I'm not vain about these things. It was a great success at the time. And anyway, this trip out to the Reef was the reward, you know, for a job well done, the editor was jumping up and down in Sydney he was so mad about the manuscript, but I said, screw it, George, I'm entitled to celebrate before I come back, because once you're in this world you're in it, aren't you? So where was I? The Reef, yes. It was my first time out there, by helicopter, of course--first time in a copter, if you can believe it--and we were four blokes . . .&
Continues...
Excerpted from The Emperor's Children by Claire Messud Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
loading...
loading...
loading...
Terms of Use, Copyright, and Privacy Policy
© 1997-2009 Barnesandnoble.com llc