Available for Download
Works with the eReader you already own Learn More
Welcome to the world's most advanced eBook reader. Get your favorite books, newspapers and magazines, plus exclusive reads from Barnes & Noble all delivered via fast and free wireless.

(eBook)
Learn more
| More Formats | |
|---|---|
| Hardcover - Bargain | $6.98 |
| Paperback - Reprint | $18.00 |
Long before Robert Novak became the center of a political firestorm in the Valerie Plame CIA leak scandal, he had established himself as one of the finest—and most controversial—political reporters in America. Now, in this sweeping, monumental memoir, Novak offers the first full account of his involvement in that affair, while also revealing the fascinating story of his remarkable life and career. This is a singular journey through a half century of stories, scandals, and personal encounters with Washington’s most powerful and colorful people.
Novak has been a Washington insider since the days when the place was a sleepy southern town and journalism was built on shoe leather and the ability to cultivate and keep sources (not to mention the ability to hold one’s liquor). He has covered every president since Truman, known (personally and professionally) virtually all the big movers and shakers in D.C., and broken a number of the biggest stories—the Plame story, we see here, being far from the most important. In this book, he puts it all into perspective. He also reveals the extraordinary transformations that have fundamentally remade Washington, politics, and journalism—and his own role in those transformations.
Moving beyond the “first draft of history” that is daily journalism, Novak can at last tell the stories behind the stories. He vividly recalls encounters with the Kennedys (angry meetings with Bobby, a scary ride home in Jack’s convertible), his unusual relationship with Lyndon Johnson (who hosted Novak’s wedding reception and who, “drunk as a loon,” had to be carried out of a bar by theyoung newsman), a decidedly odd off-the-record lunch with Ronald Reagan, and his first meetings with George W. Bush—at which the veteran journalist seriously underestimated the future president. We meet other fascinating characters as well, from Deng Xiaoping to Ted Turner to Ezra Pound.
Writing with bracing candor, Novak tells us how politics and journalism truly operate at the highest levels, both publicly and behind closed doors. He is equally open about his private experience. He writes frankly about the days when his drinking reflected too closely the boozy ways of the town. He acknowledges times when his job took precedence over his family. He is reflective about his political journey to the right. And he writes more personally than ever before about his spiritual journey, from his early life as a secular Jew to his conversion to Catholicism at the age of sixty-seven.
Packed with riveting, never-before-told stories, The Prince of Darkness is a hugely entertaining and equally perceptive view of fifty years in the life of Washington and the people who cover it.
Journalism is the first rough draft of history, Philip Graham, the publisher of The Washington Post, once said. Many Novak columnsincluding the Plame pieceare first rough drafts of journalism; they require further assembly by readers. While other writers concentrate on the arteries of power, Novak has made a specialty of the capillaries. Still, his book is an enlightening field guide to the politicians and journalists who inhabit those micro places.
More Reviews and RecommendationsROBERT D. NOVAK writes “Inside Report,” one of the longest-running syndicated columns in the nation, and the “Evans-Novak Political Report,” which he began in the 1960s with the late Rowland Evans. Now a Fox News contributor, he spent twenty-five years as a political commentator for CNN. Novak is the author or coauthor of five other books, the most recent being Completing the Revolution. He lives in Washington, D.C.
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
September 27, 2007: Basically, I found the book interesting and informational. But all the hullabaloo over release of these memoirs has obscured a troubling question regarding Novak's role in the Valerie Plame Wilson leak case: that is, why didn't Novak immediately issue a statement that Karl Rove was NOT his source? Am I the only one asking? Although Novak knew the primary source of the alleged leak to be former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, he waited almost three years before speaking out. His failure to do so early on is puzzling, as is his reference in his 'outing' column to having had conversations with 'two senior White House officials.' Surely he knew that such a remark would unleash the liberal media and Democrats in Congress and elsewhere on a 'witchhunt' seeking the identity of those two. Meanwhile, during that three year interval, the White House, President Bush and Karl Rove were subjected to unmerciful, relentless attacks and harrassment from the Left. Rove was forced to defend himself against unfounded accusations that he was the source of the leak. This required him to hire a lawyer at great personal expense, and waste his time and energy parading to the Courthouse to answer Grand Jury questions put to him by the special prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, and telling the same story: 'I did not out Valerie Plame. There was no plot by the President to hurt Joe Wilson.' Later, Fitzgerald admitted he had no evidence linking Rove to the leak. After his infamous press conference at which he announced that no indictment would be forthcoming against Rove, groans of disappointment from the Left were audible. And President Bush? He was accused by the liberal media 'David Corn of The Nation Magazine was only one of many' of having masterminded a plot to 'out' Joe Wilson's wife to 'get even' with Wilson for his 2002 report for the CIA debunking intelligence that Iraq tried to buy uranium in Africa. The liberal media also gave wide, prominent coverage to a Senate speech by Harry Reid (D-NV) placing this example of left-wing paranoia on the public record. Mr. Bush was slandered daily by Democrats for a 'lack of moral values' and 'lack of integrity.' Talk about the proverbial pot calling the kettle black! Although Democrats continued publicly to parrot that the whole thing MUST have been a Republican plot, their sleazy house of cards finally completely collapsed around their ears in September 2006, when former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage confessed publicly that HE had revealed Plame's identity to Novak. That was followed a week later by a 'clarification' column from Novak, which, although welcome and helpful, did not explain why he himself had not stepped forward earlier with a statement that Rove had NOT been his source. Perhaps, in a way he has explained. All those years of heavy drinking in the Washington pubs may have soaked his brain with alcohol, thereby slightly addling his thinking. A year ago I wrote in one of my columns: 'Meanwhile, don't hold your breath waiting for an apology to President Bush, Karl Rove, and the public from liberal Democrats, commentators, and journalists for this partisan ploy, which was at the least an expensive distraction from the people's bona fide business.' 'See 'My Turn to Sound Off: Being a Liberal Means Never Having to Say You're Sorry!' Anthony J. Sacco, Sr., October 2006. Now however, it appears that the above-named groups are not the only ones who owe apologies....