Click "Buy Now" or "Get Free eBook" to instantly purchase or add eBooks to your collection. They'll be available online in the My eBooks Library section of your account, nook and B&N eReader. All you need to is a default credit card.
Set default credit cardAvailable for Download
![]() Buy an eBook or Try a Free Sample | ![]() | ![]() Your eBooks will be stored in your eBooks Library. From there, you can download them any time to your iPhone, Blackberry or computer. Visit your eBooks Library |
Works with the eReader you already own Learn More
Start reading a sample of this eBook for free! Learn More
Click "Get Free Sample" and a partial sample will be available online in the My eBooks Library section of your account, nook and B&N eReader. If you enjoy it, you can always purchase the full eBook to continue reading.
Welcome to the world's most advanced eBook reader. Get your favorite books, newspapers and magazines, plus exclusive reads from Barnes & Noble all delivered via fast and free wireless.

(eBook)
Learn more
| More Formats | |
|---|---|
| Hardcover | $23.70 |
| Paperback | $12.80 |
| Compact Disc - Unabridged | $33.20 |
| MP3 Book - Unabridged | $18.67 |
It is always risky for a writer or filmmaker to produce a sequel to a favorite work: the second installment so seldom measures up to the first, and all too often taints its predecessor with its comparative mediocrity. But John Updike is not one to let the odds bother him -- and why should he? He is blessed with seemingly infinite inventive resources and can afford to be daring and profligate with his ideas; sometimes his wild imaginative leaps succeed and sometimes they don't, but failure has never made him any more cautious the next time around.
Read the Full ReviewAfter traveling the world to exotic lands, Alexandra, Jane, and Sukie–now widowed but still witches–return to the Rhode Island seaside town of Eastwick, “the scene of their primes,” site of their enchanted mischief more than three decades ago. Diabolical Darryl Van Horne is gone, and what was once a center of license and liberation is now a “haven of wholesomeness” populated by hockey moms and househusbands acting out against the old ways of their own absent, experimenting parents. With spirits still willing but flesh weaker, the three women must confront a powerful new counterspell of conformity. In this wicked and wonderful novel, John Updike is at his very best–a legendary master of literary magic up to his old delightful tricks.
Updike's predictably ingenious sequel, set 30-plus years later. The mood and tone are very differentrelaxed and contemplative…The genius inheres in the precise observation, in the equally precise language, but above all in the illusion that the image has been received and processed in real time, when in truth Updike has slowed events to a dreamlike pace and given them a dream's hyperreality, so that the distinction between the actual and the imagined feels erased.
More Reviews and RecommendationsBest known for a series of novels featuring Harry "Rabbit" Angstrom, John Updike was one of the 20th century's most distinguished American authors. Over the course of his long, prolific career, he garnered numerous literary awards, including two coveted Pulitzer Prizes!
More About the AuthorReader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
September 28, 2009: I admire John Updike who possessed great writing skill and insight. However, this book was aimless. Fans are in for a disappointment.
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
August 15, 2009: No one loves a sentence into being like John Updike. The prose in "The Widows of Eastwick" shows all of Updike's devotion to the language. In this sequel to his 1984 novel "The Witches Of Eastwick," we witness Updike's ability to imbue characters with depth that imparts to the reader a sibling-like knowledge. He reuses the lusty thirty-something witches who created mystical mayhem and death in the sleepy seaside village of 1970's Eastwick, Rhode Island. Updike ages them through decent second marriages into widowhood and reunites them, this time bent upon undoing the harms of the past. Their aging bodies nearly depleted of sexual appeal, the septuagenarians' powers are severely diminished. The widows are pitted not only against the memories of others and the vengeful efforts of a warlock orphaned by their previous exploits, but against the town itself.
Mr. Updike adds flesh to the village creating for us a living, breathing character as familiar as the streets to which we return each evening. The town has become a bedroom community filled with doting parents and over programed children. The women lament the superficial wholesomeness. Sibilant Jane expresses their collective exasperation. "People go around mourning the death of God. It's the death of sssin that bothers me. Without sin, people aren't people any more, they're just ssoul-less sheep." Descriptions are classic Updike: as in the "glaring sidewalk, fleshy people in summer shorts casting squat self-important shadows, wilting zinnias in beds next to the concrete post-office steps, the American flag hanging limp on its pole overhead." In "The Widows" John Updike conjures for us a cocktail of exacting observation expressed in stunning prose which reveals more about each of us then we would care to let the novelist know.Name:
John Updike
Also Known As:
John Hoyer Updike (full name)
Date of Birth:
March 18, 1932
Place of Birth:
Shillington, Pennsylvania
Date of Death
January 27, 2009
Place of Death
Beverly Farms, MA
Education:
A.B. in English, Harvard University, 1954; also studied at the Ruskin School of Drawing and Fine Art in Oxford, England
Awards:
National Book Award for The Centaur, 1964; Pulitzer Prizer, National Book Critics Circle Award, and National Book Award for Rabbit Is Rich, 1982; Pulitzer Prize and National Book Critics Circle Award for Rabbit at Rest, 1990
With an uncommonly varied oeuvre that includes poetry, criticism, essays, short stories, and novels, two-time Pulitzer Prize winner John Updike helped to change the face of late-20th-century American literature.
Born in Reading, Pennsylvania, Updike graduated summa cum laude from Harvard in 1954. Following a year of study in England, he joined the staff of The New Yorker, establishing a relationship with the magazine that continued until his death in January, 2009. For more than 50 years, he lived in two small towns in Massachusetts that inspired the settings for several of his stories.
In 1958, Updike's first collection of poetry was published. A year later, he made his fiction debut with The Poorhouse Fair. But it was his second novel, 1960's Rabbit, Run, that forged his reputation and introduced one of the most memorable characters in American fiction. Former small-town basketball star Harry "Rabbit" Angstrom struck a responsive chord with readers and critics alike and catapulted Updike into the literary stratosphere.
Updike would revisit Angstrom in 1971, 1981, and 1990, chronicling his hapless protagonist's jittery journey into undistinguished middle age in three melancholy bestsellers: Rabbit Redux, Rabbit Is Rich, and Rabbit at Rest. A concluding novella, "Rabbit Remembered," appeared in the 2001 story collection Licks of Love.
Although autobiographical elements appear in the Rabbit books, Updike's true literary alter ego was not Harry Angstrom but Harry Bech, a famously unproductive Jewish-American writer who starred in his own story cycle. In between -- indeed, far beyond -- his successful series, Updike went on to produce an astonishingly diverse string of novels. In addition, his criticism and short fiction became popular staples of distinguished literary publications.
Updike first became entranced by reading when he was a young boy growing up on an isolated farm in Pennsylvania. Afflicted with psoriasis and a stammer, he escaped his self-consciousness by immersing himself in drawing, writing, and reading.
An accomplished artist, Updike accepted a one-year fellowship to study painting at the Ruskin School of Drawing and Fine Arts at Oxford University. He decided to attend Harvard University because he was a big fan of the school's humor magazine, The Harvard Lampoon.
One of the most respected authors of the 20th century, Updike won every major literary prize in America, including the Guggenheim Fellow, the Rosenthal Award, the National Book Award in Fiction, the O. Henry Prize, the American Book Award, the National Book Critics Circle Award, the Union League Club Abraham Lincoln Award, the National Arts Club Medal of Honor, and the National Medal of the Arts.
It is always risky for a writer or filmmaker to produce a sequel to a favorite work: the second installment so seldom measures up to the first, and all too often taints its predecessor with its comparative mediocrity. But John Updike is not one to let the odds bother him -- and why should he? He is blessed with seemingly infinite inventive resources and can afford to be daring and profligate with his ideas; sometimes his wild imaginative leaps succeed and sometimes they don't, but failure has never made him any more cautious the next time around.
One of the most eccentric ideas he ever came up with was the premise for The Witches of Eastwick (1985): three women develop magical powers upon divorcing their husbands and operate as a coven in the seaside town of Eastwick, Rhode Island. What makes the book so funny and clever is that aside from their witching prowess there is nothing very remarkable about Alexandra, Jane, and Sukie: they are just highly sexed women on the cusp of middle age, working their way through all the available (and indeed unavailable) local male talent. ("Being a divorcée in a small town is a little like playing Monopoly," Alexandra reflects; "eventually you land on all the properties.") True to the humorless political literalism of the last couple of decades, quite a few readers considered The Witches of Eastwick to be a misogynist work, but when you look at it unblinkered by ideology, it is clear that the novel constitutes a passionately enthusiastic paean to the Circean sexual powers of ripe femininity, and the pitiless greed with which it demands to be satisfied.
Now, with The Widows of Eastwick, Updike has brought his witches into the new century. When they left Rhode Island back in the 1970s, each woman had conjured up an ideal husband: Jane, an antique-collecting Boston Brahmin; Alexandra, a cowboy/potter in Taos; Sukie, a slick money man. Now, all widowed and approaching 70, they decide to return to Eastwick for a summer, partly out of lingering guilt over the evil deeds they committed there so long ago and partly, we suspect, in an attempt to regain a bit of the power -- physical, sexual, magical -- they enjoyed in their prime. "There's something there, there always was," Jane insists. "The spirit of Anne Hutchinson, it could be. It was liberating, empowering. We came into our own. We should never have found husbands and left."
Marriage, they consider, diminished their powers; now they try to regain them, just at that fatal moment when nature has become their enemy instead of their ally. "I used to think I loved [nature]," Alexandra says, "but now that it's chewing me to death, I realize I hate it and fear it." And coming back together as a trio, they do retaste a little of the heady past, at least momentarily.
But they are old, and the times are radically different. The decade of the 1970s, post-Pill, pre-AIDS, was the heyday of supercharged extramarital sex, and Updike was its prophet. Thirty-five years on, he and his characters wonder why it is all so different now. Jane thinks that perhaps the repression that still hung on into the '70s had something to do with the era's feeling of pent-up energy, and she compares Then and Now with some asperity:
And the younger people, the age we were when we were here -- ssso tiresome, just from the look of them, toned-up young mothers driving their overweight boys in overweight SUVs to hockey practice twenty miles away, the young fathers castrated namby-pambies helping itty-bitty wifey with the housekeeping, spending all Saturday fussing around the lovely home. It's the Fifties all over again, without the Russians as an excuse. You wonder how they managed to fuck enough to make their precious children. They probably didn't -- it's all in vitro now, and every birth is cesarean, so the doctors won't get sued. People go around mourning the death of God; it's the death of sin that bothers me. Without sin, people aren't people any more, they're just sheep.
As this citation shows, the three witches are not afraid of sin. As it also shows, they have little time for the younger generation, including their own children. All three were neglectful mothers, even by the loose standards of their day; now they are peevishly resented by their adult offspring, whom they look on, in turn, with contempt -- especially the daughters, who are disappointingly un-witchlike. Updike dealt with the three women's inadequate mothering off-handedly in the first novel -- after all, that was just the way his generation behaved -- but The Widows of Eastwick is, in part, an apology to the wronged children. Alexandra coexists calmly enough with her son ("He actually was a Republican, like his father -- but it seemed much worse in a son than in a husband. You expected it in a husband") but finds herself compelled to come to some sort of emotional terms with her daughter Marcie, now an unattractive 50-year-old Eastwick housewife who still seems to be searching for something she didn't get from her mother -- what? Attention, as someone suggests? Rules to live by?
Updike's powers, like those of his witches, unfortunately seem to have dimmed in this return to his old stomping ground. The Widows of Eastwick is an intelligent and rewarding book, like almost everything he produces, but it retains only mild vestiges of the truly magical sheen of the first volume, which especially in its virtuosic first 50 pages or so saw the author at the very top of his game, a far greater magus than the witches' nemesis, Darryl Van Horne. Updike can still weave spells with words and images, but he does so infrequently in The Widows of Eastwick, which assumes a markedly crepuscular tone as the witches approach "the engulfing indifference that readies us for death." Jane, Alexandra, and Sukie are fading out, and no new witches have appeared in Eastwick to take their place. Perhaps this is because modern women don't need witchcraft: Eastwick's family doctor and Unitarian minister are now women, after all, and everywhere it seems that "women were at last inheriting the world, leaving men to sink ever deeper in their fantasies of violence and domination." As I reader I don't really believe this -- and neither, I imagine, does Updike, who throughout his long career has done as much to celebrate maleness and the male point of view as any writer in American history. --Brooke Allen
Brooke Allen is the author of Twentieth-Century Attitudes; Artistic License; and Moral Minority. She is a contributor to The New York Times Book Review, The New Criterion, The New Leader, The Hudson Review, and The Nation, among others. She was named a finalist for the 2007 Nona Balakian Citation for Excellence in Reviewing from the National Book Critics Circle.
After traveling the world to exotic lands, Alexandra, Jane, and Sukie–now widowed but still witches–return to the Rhode Island seaside town of Eastwick, “the scene of their primes,” site of their enchanted mischief more than three decades ago. Diabolical Darryl Van Horne is gone, and what was once a center of license and liberation is now a “haven of wholesomeness” populated by hockey moms and househusbands acting out against the old ways of their own absent, experimenting parents. With spirits still willing but flesh weaker, the three women must confront a powerful new counterspell of conformity. In this wicked and wonderful novel, John Updike is at his very best–a legendary master of literary magic up to his old delightful tricks.
Updike's predictably ingenious sequel, set 30-plus years later. The mood and tone are very differentrelaxed and contemplative…The genius inheres in the precise observation, in the equally precise language, but above all in the illusion that the image has been received and processed in real time, when in truth Updike has slowed events to a dreamlike pace and given them a dream's hyperreality, so that the distinction between the actual and the imagined feels erased.
…more emotionally credible work than its predecessor. Mr. Updike is less interested here in scoring didactic points against feminism than he is in exploring the wages of time and age shared by men and women alike, and there is an elegiac tone to the novel not dissimilar to that in the last Rabbit novel, Rabbit at Rest (1990). The mood here reflects his characters' realization that the past now weighs more than the future in the scale of their lives, and that the noisy imperatives of sex, which once got them in to so much trouble, have given way to whispered worries about bodily ailments and medical woes…His leading ladies are more compelling not as supernatural sorceresses but as ordinary women, haunted by the sins of their youth, frightened of the looming prospect of the grave and trying their best to get by, day by day by day.
Three decades after the original release of Updike's The Witches of Eastwick comes this follow-up featuring the same depressed, divorced and devilish ladies of the original. This time around the women are, naturally, widows who travel the world searching for happiness and ultimately find themselves back in Eastwick. Kate Reading gives a powerful and entertaining performance, capturing the essence of each character with equally driven intensity and passion. The flawless Reading is especially captivating in her role as witch Sukie. Though Updike's writing may not possess the same power that it had in the original, Reading keeps listeners focused on the present and yearning for more in the future. A Knopf hardcover (Reviews, July 28). (Nov.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Twenty-four years after they flew into our lives, those audacious and lovable Witches of Eastwick are back. Now widowed and living in various parts of the country, Alexandra, Jane, and Sukie get together for a return trip to the Rhode Island village that they haunted so many years ago and that was the scene of one of their most murderous acts. Once they arrive, they find the welcome mat rolled up and the village's citizens angry, bewildered, anxious, and vengeful. As they meet up with old lovers, children, and friends, the three soon find themselves tangled in a mysterious and magical web of fateful events that ruins their trip and alters their lives forever. Like most of his recent novels-with the exception of Terrorist-this latest is an unsatisfying rumination on the loss of sexual vitality and death. As elegant a writer as he is, Updike has not quite been able to create fully drawn women characters who have vital lives and personalities of their own. Still, fans of The Witches of Eastwick who have always wondered what happened to the trio will want to read this novel, and most libraries will want to own any Updike novel.
Once again summoning characters from his previous books, Updike catches up with the fetching trio of amateur sorceresses introduced in The Witches of Eastwick (1984). Though they share the state of widowhood, geographical distance and the whims of fortune have long since separated the women. There's Junoesque Alexandra ("Lexa," the eldest, having reached 70-something), surviving in Taos, N.M., on her late husband's modest estate; tightly wound Jane, who married money and now has oodles of it; and resourceful Sukie, who has channeled her pert sexuality into a string of bestselling romance novels. Deflecting mortality's momentum by compulsive traveling (Canada, China, Egypt-each "done" memorably, thanks to Updike's unerring grasp of revelatory indigenous detail), the reunited trio undertake a summer in Rhode Island, where their "coven" was formed, and dangerous mischief was performed. Old acquaintances, victims and enemies greet and threaten them, and Lexa's nagging fears of bodily breakdown and looming death create an inhibiting atmosphere of entrapment. Their former collaborator in sexual malfeasance, Darryl Van Horne (memorably enacted on film by a leering Jack Nicholson), has left potent traces of his influence. This is a most curious novel. Updike haters will quickly point out its lax pacing, encyclopedic sufficiency of laboriously assimilated information and tedious fixation on lubricious sexual detail. Admirers will note its seamless blending of dexterously plotted narrative with penetrating characterizations that evoke with nearly Tolstoyan poignancy the weary, resigned clairvoyance of old age (e.g., Lexa's intuition that "the cells of my body are getting impatient with me. They'rebored with housing my spirit"). A work of old age that takes its time, gently drawing us into its knowing orbit. We inhabit this story as we do the later stages of our own lives. Some will not like the book, but it is a vital part of the Updike experience. First printing of 200,000. Book-of-the-Month Club main selection
Loading...
Excerpted from The Widows of Eastwick by John Updike
Copyright © 2008 by John Updike. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
loading...
loading...
loading...
Terms of Use, Copyright, and Privacy Policy
© 1997-2010 Barnesandnoble.com llc




