DELIVERY & GIFT DETAILS:
Usually ships within 24 hours
Delivery Time and Shipping Rates
Eligible for gift wrap & gift message.

Reserve it at BN.com & pick it up in 60 minutes at your local store.
Enter a zip code
(Paperback)
Women and men live in different worlds...made of different words.
Spending nearly four years on the New York Times bestseller list, including eight months at number one, You Just Don't Understand is a true cultural and intellectual phenomenon. This is the book that brought gender differences in ways of speaking to the forefront of public awareness. With a rare combination of scientific insight and delightful, humorous writing, Tannen shows why women and men can walk away from the same conversation with completely different impressions of what was said.
Studded with lively and entertaining examples of real conversations, this book gives you the tools to understand what went wrong and to find a common language in which to strengthen relationships at work and at home. A classic in the field of interpersonal relations, this book will change forever the way you approach conversations.
Acclaimed sociolinguist Deborah Tannen uses telling examples ranging from real life to literary realism, as she stunningly demonstrates how--even in the closest relationships--women and men live in "different worlds."
Georgetown University linguistics professor Tannen here ponders gender-based differences that, she claims, define and distinguish male and female communication. Opening with the rationale that ignoring such differences is more dangerous than blissful, she asserts that for most women conversation is a way of connecting and negotiating. Thus, their parleys tend to center on expressions of and responses to feelings, or what the author labels ``rapport-talk'' (private conversation). Men, on the other hand, use conversation to achieve or maintain social status; they set out to impart knowledge (termed ``report-talk,'' or public speaking). Calling on her research into the workings of dialogue, Tannen examines the functioning of argument and interruption, and convincingly supports her case for the existence of ``genderlect,'' contending that the better we understand it, the better our chances of bridging the communications gap integral to the battle of the sexes. (June)
More Reviews and RecommendationsEver since she published her breakthrough book, You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation, Deborah Tannen has established herself as a foremost expert on the art of communication throughout the world. With the publication of You’re Wearing That?, Tannen takes on one of the most complex relationships in the family structure.
More About the AuthorReader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
January 25, 2008: I read the book for a research paper I was writing. I found the book informative but hard to relate to my own life. However it was a great book towards my paper.
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
March 07, 2006: I thought this book was very biased and only looked at the side of men as being powerful and having complete dominance over women which is certainly not true in life. This book also talked about how there are not many successful women, which again, is not true at all because there are plenty of women out there that have poisitions of authority in business and are taken seriously. Altogether, I was just not very impressed by this reading because I guess I had thought that it would have more of a story line to it but it mainly consisted of just facts and dialogue examples. In conclusion, this book just wasn't what I had expected.
Name:
Deborah Tannen
Current Home:
Washington, D.C. metro area
Date of Birth:
June 07, 1945
Place of Birth:
Brooklyn, New York
Education:
B.A., Harpur College, 1966, Wayne State University, 1970; M.A. in Linguistics, UC Berkeley, 1976; Ph.D., 1979
Awards:
Linguistics, Language, and the Public Award, Linguistic Society of America, 2005; Woman of Distinction Award, American Association of University Women, May 2004; Books for a Better Life Award for I Only Say This Because I Love You, 2001
In 2001, Deborah Tannen published a book that explored the eternally complex relationship between men and women, specifically why communication can be so darn difficult between the sexes. You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation clearly struck a chord with its readers, spending nearly four years on the New York Times bestseller list (holding the No. 1 spot for eight weeks) and having been translated into 29 languages. Bolstered by Tannen's extensive experience as a linguist, You Just Don't Understand has played a significant role in improving relations between men and women throughout the world.
Tannen followed her breakthrough work with several others that have tackled the difficulties in improving communication on the job (Talking from 9 to 5: Women and Men at Work), the source of argumentativeness (The Argument Culture: Stopping America's War of Words), and general disagreements within families (I Only Say This Because I Love You). Now Tannen is turning her attention to improving communications between two groups that share one of the most complicated relationships of all: mothers and daughters.
You're Wearing That?: Understanding Daughters and Mothers in Conversation is yet another ambitious attempt to examine, understand, and resolve the long-standing communication difficulties that so often plague families. Tannen delineated the nature of the particularly thorny interactions between mothers and daughters in an article she recently wrote for The Washington Post. In her article, Tannen stated that "there is a special intensity to the mother-daughter relationship because talk -- particularly talk about personal topics -- plays a larger and more complex role in girls' and women's social lives than in boys' and men's. For girls and women, talk is the glue that holds a relationship together -- and the explosive that can blow it apart. That's why you can think you're having a perfectly amiable chat, then suddenly find yourself wounded by the shrapnel from an exploded conversation."
You're Wearing That? is her attempt to defuse such potential explosiveness, to get to the root of why daughters and mothers so often hit walls when relating to one another. Tannen's own strained relationship with her ailing mother was part of the impetus that caused her to begin asking the questions that this insightful book strives to answer. Along the way, she explored not only her own relationship with her mother but those of many others, as well. "I interviewed dozens of women of varied geographic, racial and cultural backgrounds," she explained in her article. "I had informal conversations or e-mail exchanges with countless others. The complaint I heard most often from daughters was, ‘My mother is always criticizing me.' The corresponding complaint from mothers was, ‘I can't open my mouth. She takes everything as criticism.' Both are right, but each sees only her perspective."
Once again, Tannen has proven her skills as a great communicator, and has penned another instant classic in the field of self-improvement. You're Wearing That? has already achieved bestseller status and inspired Miriam Wolf of the San Francisco Chronicle to call it "a book any mother would be proud her daughter wrote." Tannen should surely be proud that she has made such a significant and positive impact on those who have read her work.
Make no mistake: Deborah Tannen is not just another self-help guru. She has published an impressive body of work that includes 20 books and over 100 articles. She is also the recipient of five honorary doctorates.
Tannen may be most famous for her linguistics studies, but she has also published short stories, poems, personal essays, and plays. In fact, her first play, An Act of Devotion, was chosen for inclusion in The Best American Short Plays: 1993-1994.
The sage relationship advice that Tannen has imparted is not limited to the printed page. She has also lectured all over the world, once addressing an audience of U.S. senators and their spouses.
Some interesting outtakes from our interview with Tannen:
"I lived in Greece for several years; I speak Greek and consider Greece my second home. The first book I ever wrote was literary criticism about a modern Greek writer, Lilika Nakou."
"One of the most exciting experiences I have ever had was seeing a play I wrote produced by Horizons Theater in Washington, D.C. Another was having my play An Act of Devotion accepted and published in Best American Short Plays 1993-1994."
"I didn't start grad school in linguistics until I was 30. When I graduated from college, I had no ambitions other than to travel and not to go grad school. I worked for Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in Manhattan, lived with my parents in Brooklyn, and saved my money to go to Europe on a one-way ticket. My plan was to go around the world. But I got only as far as Greece, where I got a job teaching English. It was through teaching English as a second language that I first became aware of linguistics."
What was the book that most influenced your life or your career as a writer?
In a way, I could say Robin Lakoff's Language and Woman's Place, although it wasn't the book itself, but the material in the book and its author. I was inspired to get a Ph.D. at UC Berkeley and become a linguist because of a course I took with Lakoff at a linguistic institute at the U. of Michigan in 1973, and some of the material in that course was published shortly thereafter in that book. Lakoff was one of the few linguists interested in how people use language in everyday conversation, and one of the first to write about differences in how women and men use language. She points out, for example, that men "pass out" but women "faint" -- and the former is somehow perceived as more serious, the latter more frivolous. Feminine word endings also suggest frivolousness. She asks, "Would you entrust your life to a ‘doctorette' "?
The entire summer institute, and Lakoff's course in particular, made me see that I could use linguistics to combine my love of language with my interest in relationships.
What are your ten favorite books, and what makes them special to you?
This is tough; I love many books, and it seems unfair to pick ten out of the pack. There are those I've read recently and those I read decades ago! I'll try.
What are some of your favorite films, and what makes them unforgettable to you?
Again, so many to choose from. I think first of the many foreign films I saw in the '60s and '70s. Some that remain vivid in my mind are Fellini's Amarcord, because of its panorama of quirky individual lives, and of Bergman's Scenes from a Marriage, which I especially appreciate because I wrote a linguistic analysis of it, so I have a very detailed understanding of how perfectly and insightfully Bergman traces the dissolution of a marriage and the couple's ongoing relationship.
More recently I have missed those slow, thoughtful foreign films that are about real people and their everyday lives, with dialogue that sounds realistic. A film I liked is Magnolia, because it had that lyrical quality, and the characters were believable. I always say that a work of art -- a book, film or play -- only works if you care about the characters, and in that film, I did. I liked Brokeback Mountain very much for that reason, too. I found myself thinking about the characters for days after, wishing they could have found happiness together. When I saw scenes from the movie in the academy award ceremony, that concern for them came flooding back.
What types of music do you like? Is there any particular kind you like to listen to when you're writing?
I don't listen to music while I'm writing, but I love folk music. I confess: I'm an old folkie who spent her teenage years hanging around Greenwich Village in New York City. I still love all the old greats like Phil Ochs, Pete Seeger, the Weavers. OK, I'm dating myself. I especially cherish those who are still performing: Theodore Bikel, Tom Paxton, Peter Paul and Mary, and Peggy Seeger.
I also love a cappella music of all kinds. My husband and I love to go to concerts of the old great doo-wop groups, like the Temptations and the Four Tops. There was an a cappella group called the Flirtations that performed in the '90s that we particularly loved. We try to never miss the a cappella concerts at Georgetown, featuring the many student groups, both homegrown and visiting from other colleges.
If you had a book club, what would it be reading?
Alice Mattison's novel In Case We're Separated. I love how she captures the real lives of real people and the daily dramas that seem insignificant but make up our lives.
What are your favorite kinds of books to give -- and get -- as gifts?
My favorite would be a book I mentioned wanting to read. I also enjoy large photo books because I can return to them briefly from time to time.
Do you have any special writing rituals? For example, what do you have on your desk when you're writing?
My desk is a mess; how I wish it were not so. But luckily, when I start writing, I get absorbed and don't see the mess. My only ritual, if you call it that, is that I have to start in the morning, the earlier the better. Once it's afternoon and I haven't started, then forget it; I have to wait for the next morning.
Many writers are hardly "overnight success" stories. How long did it take for you to get where you are today? Any rejection slip horror stories or inspirational anecdotes?
I guess you've have to count from the time I first sent an article to a women's magazine while I was a grad student, which was probably 1975, until 1990 when my book You Just Don't Understand became a bestseller (and remained so for nearly four years). That's 15 years during which I hardly took a day off, and worked pretty much all day every day, weekends as well as weekdays. Most of this was academic research and academic articles and books based on it, but I also wrote a few magazine articles and a book, That's Not What I Meant!, presenting some of that research for a general audience. You Just Don't Understand was my tenth book.
Setbacks along the way? Ah, you don't know the half of it. Or the tenth. I'll tell one: My first book for a general audience, That's Not What I Meant!
I knew I wanted to write a book for general readers about the importance of understanding how language works (what I call "conversational style" or ways of speaking) for relationships. I began by writing a draft of such a book in the form of questions and answers. On the basis of this, I found an agent, who told me how to rewrite the material as a proposal -- a second rewriting of the material. On the basis of this I got a small advance, a contract, and an editor who had a different vision for the book. After I'd written 100 pages to his specifications, he left the company, and I was assigned an editor who had another conception of what the book should be and told me to start fresh and write a complete draft without censoring myself. This I did. I sent her a 300-page draft that she pronounced unsuitable. By way of guidance, she sent me a package of paperback self-help books and the suggestion that I look them over to see how to structure my book. I was devastated.
I eventually pulled myself together and drew up an outline (without looking at the self-help books) that went from the littlest pieces of language ("linguistic devices") to bigger ones ("conversational strategies") and from there to situations and topics like gender differences. With this outline approved, I wrote the first three chapters, which pleased her. I then wrote three more, and sent them to her -- and learned she was leaving the company.
I was assigned a third editor who believed my book should focus on male/female differences. I agreed to throw out the six chapters I had just written, and prepared a detailed outline of a different book. But I put off writing it, and turned my attention instead to a technical paper in linguistics that I worked on for the next six months. This turned out to be a blessing, since this editor was fired. I was then assigned yet another editor -- my fourth -- who had yet another book in mind. She read everything I had written to that point and declared it all unacceptable. It was clear from talking to her that she had concluded I was a problem who had been kicking around for so long that I clearly was incapable of writing a book. At that point my agent moved the project to another publisher, where an editor happily approved the version that the third and fourth editors at the first house had rejected. I wrote the last chapters, and the book was published -- exactly as I had written it, with no changes.
If you could choose one new writer to be discovered, who would it be?
Micah Perks, because she's my niece.
What tips or advice do you have for writers still looking to be discovered?
This is more geared to a fiction writer I think. Nonfiction writers who have an area of expertise, which is the only type of publishing I know, I advise to get articles into magazines first, and use them to find an agent, then cross your fingers while s/he does the walking.
Women and men live in different worlds...made of different words.
Spending nearly four years on the New York Times bestseller list, including eight months at number one, You Just Don't Understand is a true cultural and intellectual phenomenon. This is the book that brought gender differences in ways of speaking to the forefront of public awareness. With a rare combination of scientific insight and delightful, humorous writing, Tannen shows why women and men can walk away from the same conversation with completely different impressions of what was said.
Studded with lively and entertaining examples of real conversations, this book gives you the tools to understand what went wrong and to find a common language in which to strengthen relationships at work and at home. A classic in the field of interpersonal relations, this book will change forever the way you approach conversations.
Georgetown University linguistics professor Tannen here ponders gender-based differences that, she claims, define and distinguish male and female communication. Opening with the rationale that ignoring such differences is more dangerous than blissful, she asserts that for most women conversation is a way of connecting and negotiating. Thus, their parleys tend to center on expressions of and responses to feelings, or what the author labels ``rapport-talk'' (private conversation). Men, on the other hand, use conversation to achieve or maintain social status; they set out to impart knowledge (termed ``report-talk,'' or public speaking). Calling on her research into the workings of dialogue, Tannen examines the functioning of argument and interruption, and convincingly supports her case for the existence of ``genderlect,'' contending that the better we understand it, the better our chances of bridging the communications gap integral to the battle of the sexes. (June)
Loading...Many years ago I was married to a man who shouted at me, "I do not give you the right to raise your voice to me, because you are a woman and I am a man." This was frustrating, because I knew it was unfair. But I also knew just what was going on. I ascribed his unfairness to his having grown up in a country where few people thought women and men might have equal rights.
Now I am married to a man who is a partner and friend. We come from similar backgrounds and share values and interests. It is a continual source of pleasure to talk to him. It is wonderful to have someone I can tell everything to, someone who understands. But he doesn't always see things as I do, doesn't always react to things as I expect him to. And I often don't understand why he says what he does.
At the time I began working on this book, we had jobs in different cities. People frequently expressed sympathy by making comments like "That must be rough," and "How do you stand it?" I was inclined to accept their sympathy and say things like "We fly a lot." Sometimes I would reinforce their concern: "The worst part is having to pack and unpack all the time." But my husband reacted differently, often with irritation. He might respond by de-emphasizing the inconvenience: As academics, we had four-day weekends together, as well as long vacations throughout the year and four months in the summer. We even benefited from the intervening days of uninterrupted time for work. I once overheard him telling a dubious man that we were lucky,since studies have shown that married couples who live together spend less than half an hour a week talking to each other; he was implying that our situation had advantages.
I didn't object to the way my husband responded everything he said was true but I was surprised by it. I didn't understand why he reacted as he did. He explained that he sensed condescension in some expressions of concern, as if the questioner were implying, "Yours is not a real marriage; your ill-chosen profession has resulted in an unfortunate arrangement. I pity you, and look down at you from the height of complacence, since my wife and I have avoided your misfortune." It had not occurred to me that there might be an element of one-upmanship in these expressions of concern, though I could recognize it when it was pointed out. Even after I saw the point, though, I was inclined to regard my husband's response as slightly odd, a personal quirk. He frequently seemed to see others as adversaries when I didn't.
Having done the research that led to this book, I now see that my husband was simply engaging the world in a way that many men do: as an individual in a hierarchical social order in which he was either one-up or one-down. In this world, conversations are negotiations in which people try to achieve and maintain the upper hand if they can, and protect themselves from others' attempts to put them down and push them around. Life, then, is a contest, a struggle to preserve independence and avoid failure.
I, on the other hand, was approaching the world as many women do: as an individual in a network of connections. In this world, conversations are negotiations for closeness in which people try to seek and give confirmation and support, and to reach consensus. They try to protect themselves from others' attempts to push them away. Life, then, is a community, a struggle to preserve intimacy and avoid isolation. Though there are hierarchies in this world too, they are hierarchies more of friendship than of power and accomplishment.
Women are also concerned with achieving status and avoiding failure, but these are not the goals they are focused on all the time, and they tend to pursue them in the guise of connection. And men are also concerned with achieving involvement and avoiding isolation, but they are not focused on these goals, and they tend to pursue them in the guise of opposition.
Discussing our differences from this point of view, my husband pointed out to me a distinction I had missed: He reacted the way I just described only if expressions of concern came from men in whom he sensed an awareness of hierarchy. And there were times when I too disliked people's expressing sympathy about our commuting marriage. I recall being offended by one man who seemed to have a leering look in his eye when he asked, "How do you manage this long-distance romance?" Another time I was annoyed when a woman who knew me only by reputation approached us during the intermission of a play, discovered our situation by asking my husband where he worked, and kept the conversation going by asking us all about it. In these cases, I didn't feel put down; I felt intruded upon. If my husband was offended by what he perceived as claims to superior status, I felt these sympathizers were claiming inappropriate intimacy.
Intimacy is key in a world of connection where individuals negotiate complex networks of friendship, minimize differences, try to reach consensus, and avoid the appearance of superiority, which would highlight differences. In a world of status, independence is key, because a primary means of establishing status is to tell others what to do, and taking orders is a marker of low status. Though all humans need both intimacy and independence, women tend to focus on the first and men on the second. It is as if their lifeblood ran in different directions.
These differences can give women and men differing views of the same situation, as they did in the case of a couple I will call Linda and Josh...
loading...
loading...
loading...
Hear our exclusive audio interview with Deborah Tannen (15:17).
Terms of Use, Copyright, and Privacy Policy
© 1997-2009 Barnesandnoble.com llc