Combining important new research with an insider's grasp of Beltway politics, Laurie Mylroie describes how the CIA and the State Department have systemically discredited critical intelligence about Saddam's regime, including indisputable evidence of its possession of weapons of mass destruction. She reveals how major elements of the case against Iraq - including information about possible links to al Qaeda and evidence of potential Iraqi involvement in the fall 2001 anthrax attacks - were prematurely dismissed by these agencies for cynical reasons. Mylroie traces how the very idea of state-sponsored terrorism was pronounced dead after the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, giving states like Iraq an opening to underwrite terrorism without being detected. And she demonstrates that the war with Iraq was not only justifiable, but the necessary and moral course of action.
As the debate on Operation Iraqi Freedom continues amid controversies over16-word misstatements and ambushes of U.S. troops, Mylroie has published a ringing defense of the president's decision to effect regime change.
More Reviews and RecommendationsReader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
September 19, 2003: Many readers, like the reviewer below, will want to insist that, on national security issues, the government of the United States works the way that we all believe it should, rather than the way it actually does. In this ideal world, when the President complains to CIA, DIA, NSA and State Department: 'you're not giving me enough intelligence to make an informed decision!', these bureaucracies would try much harder to do a better job, and they?d get the President what he needed, because their jobs would be on the line. Well, in real life, it doesn't work that way. In the real life, the folks in Quantico or Foggy Bottom look at the guy at the top, think about whether he supports their political agenda, and then do something or nothing based on whether they think it's a good idea. ?Hey, this guy probably won't be around in 4 years, but I'll still be working here, making the same analytical mistakes.? Laurie Mylroie gives us every reason in 'Bush v. The Beltway' to think that this is exactly what has happened since 9/11. Our government has continued to work they way it always has, not they way it should. It's painful to read, but it seems to be true.
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
August 25, 2003: Were you like me on 9/11, dumbfounded, angry, helpless, feeling old and useless? With the firm belief that 'knowledge equals power' I chose to make it my duty as a citizen to be as well informed as possible about terrorism, I had to be able to look my children in the eye and say I did my part in those terrible days. With the help of Dr. Mylroie, Dr.Bernard Lewis, Google, articles by James Woolsey, marvelous debates with both those who agree and those who disagree I have managed to keep the promise I made to myself that terrible morning. Now more than ever while the nation seems to have almost forgotten the terrible danger we still face, we as citizens have a basic duty to understand the issues, to read and debate these issues. We must do this without the help of some talking head interpreting them for us, if we allow the talking heads to interpret the issues for us we are going to get the company line. And as Dr. Mylroie's book so eloquently points out sometimes the company line is wrong. Dr. Mylroie's books have gone a long way to helping me understand what it is that we face. If you haven't read The War Against America: Saddam Hussein and the World Trade Center Attacks: A Study of Revenge buy the set. Then sit down and read the books while pulling on all the threads she brings up in the notes sections. Trust me when you are finished you will be shocked at the coverage in the press and perhaps just a bit angry about why all these unnamed sources aren't exposed for giving out false information. Dr. Mylroie takes on the reasons why every time someone like Donald Rumsfeld, President Bush or even Sec. of State Powell says something that goes against the company line all of those unnamed sources pop up out of nowhere contradicting those who are willing to put their names and honor behind their statements. As a person who both was inside of the government and continues to have valuable sources inside of the government she is uniquely qualified to understand and convey to us the mentality of a Government Worker who believes that his retirement trumps his desire to find the truth. These are questions that we must face if we are to try and stop this sort of nonsense in the future. The warning signs were there but the Government chose not to see them, not out of some lunatic conspiracy (put your tinfoil beanie caps away) but out of the sheer ignorant desire to defend ones territory in the Government. The chapter's on the Anthrax attacks are a reminder of the sophistication involved in those attacks and wake up call that the FBI still isn't fixed. While the FBI chase a single individual on the lone individual theory draining ponds and finding nothing but the bottom of a pond. They discount the opinions of those who point out how complex of a weapon the Anthrax sent to Daschle's office was and how dangerous it would have been had Atta rented that crop duster and made his attack. 'In my opinion, there are maybe four or five people in the whole country who might be able to make this stuff, and I'm one of them,' said Richard O. Spertzel, chief biological inspector for the U.N. Special Commission from 1994 to 1998. 'And even with a good lab and staff to help run it, it might take me a year to come up with a product as good.' And yet the FBI would have us believe that some lone nutcase manufactured this anthrax in his basement. Not likely and Dr. Mylroie will show you why. Then Dr. Mylroie address's the meeting between Atta...