(Paperback - Reprint)
As seen on "The Today Show" and in People magazine: An adoptive father and award-winning journalist reports on the metamorphosis of adoption from a secretive, shameful procedure to an integral part of American family life.
A comprehensive and humane book about how adoption is changing families-indeed the very idea of family.
More Reviews and RecommendationsAdam Pertman writes on family and children's issues for the Boston Globe. He was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize for his reports on adoption and has been awarded the Century Foundation's Leonard Silk Journalism Fellowship, the Year 2000 Media Award for exceptional dedication and commitment to children, and was honored by the Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption for Adoption Nation. He and his wife live with their two adopted children in Newton, Massachusetts.
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
August 20, 2003: Adoption Nation is a very informative book that ranges from the history of and regrettable reasons for secret adoptions, to the explosion of openness beginning in the 1970s with its empowerment of birthmothers and the selling of babies by private agencies and on the Internet. The reader is put on an exciting roller coaster of the conflicting anecdotal records of openness, of the issue of opening up past secret adoption records, of reunions between parties of closed adoptions, and of keeping all future adoptions open. But Adoption Nation is prejudiced toward open adoption and leaves out the conclusion of the largest longitudinal study published in 1998 by Harold Grotevant and McRoy, Openness in Adoption, Exploring Family Connections (Sage 1998). These authors state: 'The clearest policy implication of our work is that no single type of adoption is best for everyone. Thus, we believe that a variety of adoption arrangements should be possible by practice and by law.' These authors warn that the long-term impact of openness for all parties in the adoptive kinship network is not known and longitudinal research is necessary to answer this question. The authors found in an earlier smaller study that semi-open adoption seemed to be the least harmful to the families involved in adoption. Literature tells us that we continue today, in both public and private adoptions, not to focus on what placement might be the best for the child, but on what is best for the families, agencies or adoption professionals. We think that if the adoptive and birth parents get on well, then open adoption is good for the child too-- for all ages, and for all developmental stages. But is it? One thing seems certain from Adoption Nation: Secrecy in adoption is a thing of the past. I am an adoptive mother of a secret adoption in 1969 and I was always opposed to secrecy. Fortunately, we met our birthmother 29 years later and love her and her family. Based on what she says today about openness, and on what our adult daughter thinks about openness, the golden mean of semi-open adoption would have been the best for them, and may perhaps be the most humane practice for the adults involved, and the least problematic for the children. Gisela Gasper Fitzgerald, author of ADOPTION: An Open, Semi-Open or Closed Practice?
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
August 21, 2002: As a former adoption professional, I picked up Adoption Nation expecting to glance through it -- but I ended up reading every page. Adam Pertman's book not only overflows with smart analysis, it's filled with compelling stories of adoptees, adoptive parents, and birthparents.
Pertman dares to speak the truth and the whole truth about adoption. He doesn't shy away from honest assessment of touchy issues like race, money, and hypocrisy in the world of adoption, but he is equally articulate about the joy and connection of adoptive families. Adoption Nation manages to capture the complexity, tell amazing stories, and point us toward the future, all in one extremely readable book.