(Paperback)
| More Formats | |
|---|---|
| Hardcover | $25.00 |
In Aug. 1991 a neurologist announced the finding of a physiological difference between the brains of heterosexuals & homosexuals. This was science that not only challenged accepted beliefs but carried profound legal, political, & social implications. Two years later a team of geneticists reported finding a likely genetic basis for homosexuality in men. This book explores the rich & varied research that is currently being carried out in neurobiology, endocrinology, & genetics. It also considers the awesome ramifications of research that may well come to explain the origins of one of the fundamental components of our humanity.
Burr's detailed, elegantly written report takes us to the front lines of research into a possible biological or genetic basis for homosexuality. He dispassionately reviews the scientific and political controversy surrounding the report in 1991 by gay British neuroanatomist Simon LeVay that a cluster of cells in the brain's hypothalamus is larger in straight men than in gay men. National Cancer Institute molecular geneticist Dean Hamer's 1993 finding that a specific region of the X chromosome is linked to homosexuality in some men led to intense debate over how a "gay gene" might function in creating a homosexual orientation. Boston University geneticist Richard Pillard theorizes that the sexual centers of gay men's brains are not "defeminized"a hormone-regulated process that routinely occurs in the embryonic brains of male heterosexuals. Burr, whose 1993 cover story in the Atlantic Monthly led to this book, ponders the ethical issues swirling around Affymetrix, a Santa Clara, Calif., company that is building a semiconductor chip made of silicon and human DNA that may make possible widespread testing for a gay gene. Illustrated. Author tour. (June)
More Reviews and RecommendationsChandler Burr is the New York Times perfume critic and author of The Emperor of Scent: A Story of Perfume, Obsession, and the Last Mystery of the Senses and A Separate Creation. Burr, who earned a master’s in international economics and Japan studies from the Paul H. Nitze School/Johns Hopkins, has written for The Atlantic, The New York Times Magazine, U.S. News & World Report (where he was a contributing editor), and The New Yorker. He lives in New York City.
More About the AuthorReader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
October 19, 1999: Although Chandler Burr is a good read, it is especially bothersome in this day and age that some journalists not only assume they know the subject they choose to write about, but that they are somehow experts on topics of personal interest. Obviously, science is not Mr. Burr's expertise, and it is doubtful he has had much science education at all. Unfortunately, there are many readers of this trash that know no more than Mr. Burr about science, and will thus choose to believe what they read. Being 1999, it has become very evident that the 'science' Burr uses as the basis of all his sociological and political arguments is garbage. Even though the scientific community questioned this research upon it's release, Burr did not have enough understanding of science to see the reason for the questions. To date, there we have not seen any 'science' regarding the origins of homosexual attraction and orientation. There are years of ethological evidence regarding homosexual behavior, which is, of course, an entirely separate topic. I cannot in good conscience recommend this book to anyone who is not well-trained in the sciences and scientific method. For such readers, this will make a possibly good conversation piece regarding 'good' and 'bad' science and the ethics of particular types of biological research. My advice to readers--both gay and straight: for your own well-being and welfare, look closely at who writes what you read and what their motives might be for writing it.