Enter a zip code
Textbook (Paperback - New Edition)
Addressing systems engineers, this book introduces techniques for discovering and expressing systems requirements. The authors treat requirements as simple pieces of text, supported by operational scenarios and informal diagrams. They present the information in a step-by-step format addressing capturing requirements from users, organizing them into a clear message, techniques for requirement writing, and informal review processes. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR
More Reviews and RecommendationsIan Alexander is an independent consultant specialising in Requirements Engineering. He has written several training courses on systems and requirements engineering. He has led hundreds of training courses on systems engineering, requirements, DOORS, and DXL, and has run numerous practical workshops on scenarios, trade-offs and requirements. He was co-author of an Addison-Wesley book on HTML 3 and its 2nd Edition on HTML 4. He is the author of the Scenario Plus for Use Cases toolkit, and is a well-known speaker and writer on scenario usage. He is currently on a technology project to investigate the reuse of specifications for control systems in the German automobile industry. He helps to run the BCS Requirements Engineering Specialist Group and the IEE Professional Network for Systems Engineering. He is a Chartered Engineer.
Richard Stevens is the founder of QSS, the firm that launched the pioneering Requirements Management tool DOORS, the world¿s most popular requirements tool. He is the co-author of books on "Systems Engineering", "Software Engineering Standards", "Software Engineering Guidelines" and "Understanding Computers". In 1998, Richard was appointed as the first European Fellow of INCOSE, the International Council on Systems Engineering.
Experience has shown us that investment in the requirements process saves time, money, and effort. Yet, development efforts consistently charge ahead without investing sufficiently in the requirements process. We are so intent to develop the technical solutions that we are unwilling to take the time and effort to understand and meet the real customer needs.
From the Foreword by Ralph R. Young, author of Effective Requirements PracticesWho is it for?
If you are involved in the systems engineering process, in any company from transport and telecommunications, to aerospace and software you will learn how to write down requirements to guarantee you get the systems YOU need.What skills will I learn?
| Foreword | viii | |
| Preface | x | |
| Acknowledgments | xiii | |
| 1 | Introduction | 1 |
| 1.1 | Why do requirements matter? | 1 |
| 1.2 | Who are requirements for? | 6 |
| 1.3 | Different names for requirements | 8 |
| 1.4 | Different types of specification | 10 |
| 1.5 | The challenge of writing better requirements | 11 |
| 1.6 | The requirements writing process | 16 |
| 2 | Identifying the stakeholders | 19 |
| 2.1 | Different types of stakeholder | 19 |
| 2.2 | Your house extension: a simple case? | 21 |
| 2.3 | A practical approach to identifying stakeholders | 22 |
| Exercise 1 | Listing the stakeholders | 23 |
| 3 | Gathering requirements from stakeholders | 27 |
| 3.1 | Possible techniques | 27 |
| Exercise 2 | Asking "why?" | 31 |
| 3.2 | Interviews | 31 |
| 3.3 | Workshops | 39 |
| 3.4 | Experiencing life as a user | 44 |
| 3.5 | Observing users at work | 44 |
| 3.6 | Acting out what needs to happen | 45 |
| 3.7 | Prototypes | 48 |
| 4 | Other sources of requirements | 50 |
| 4.1 | Possible sources | 50 |
| Exercise 3 | Extracting requirements from source documents | 55 |
| Exercise 4 | Extracting requirements from a memo | 57 |
| 4.2 | Getting requirements for mass-market products | 58 |
| 4.3 | User requirements in subsystem projects | 58 |
| 5 | Structuring the requirements | 60 |
| 5.1 | You need structure as well as text | 61 |
| 5.2 | Breaking down the problem into steps | 62 |
| 5.3 | Organizing requirements into scenarios | 65 |
| 5.4 | Examples of goal decomposition | 68 |
| Exercise 5 | A structure for user requirements | 69 |
| 5.5 | Handling exceptions | 70 |
| Exercise 6 | Could anything go wrong here? | 72 |
| Exercise 7 | Exceptions | 74 |
| 5.6 | Examples and exercises in requirement structure | 75 |
| Exercise 8 | Creating a heading structure | 76 |
| Exercise 9 | The right document for each subject | 76 |
| Exercise 10 | Wrongly placed requirements | 78 |
| 6 | Requirements in context | 79 |
| 6.1 | The user requirements document | 79 |
| 6.2 | Organizing the constraints | 81 |
| Exercise 11 | Writing constraints | 87 |
| 6.3 | Defining the scope | 87 |
| Exercise 12 | Restricting the scope | 89 |
| 6.4 | Requirement attributes | 90 |
| 6.5 | Keeping track of the requirements | 92 |
| 7 | Requirements writing | 96 |
| 7.1 | Quality, not perfection | 96 |
| 7.2 | Sketch, then improve | 96 |
| 7.3 | Anatomy of a good requirement | 97 |
| 7.4 | Guidelines for good requirements | 98 |
| 7.5 | Don't write like this | 100 |
| Exercise 13 | Good requirements | 105 |
| Exercise 14 | Writing requirements for familiar domestic systems | 105 |
| Exercise 15 | Ambiguous requirements | 107 |
| 8 | Checking and reviewing | 108 |
| 8.1 | Checking the document structure with users | 108 |
| 8.2 | Checking the requirements | 111 |
| Exercise 16 | Checking individual requirements | 113 |
| Exercise 17 | Checking a set of requirements | 115 |
| 8.3 | Reviewing | 116 |
| 8.4 | Success-the reviewed document | 120 |
| Exercise 18 | Reviewing | 120 |
| Summary | 122 | |
| Appendix | Example user requirements | 124 |
| Answers to exercises | 130 | |
| Glossary | 146 | |
| Further reading | 150 | |
| Index | 155 |
It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.
G. K. Chesterton
Requirements are the key to project success. We all know this, but we often forget n and pay the price. Many projects, both in industry and in the public sector, fail to do what is needed. They deliver late, over budget, and poor quality. Missing out on requirements is disastrous.
Writing Better Requirements is designed as a short, convenient overview for practising systems engineers and others who find they need to write requirements. Because it is about practical techniques, it should be useful in many different kinds of system and software project. We aim to enable readers to write requirements good enough for successful systems to be specified, designed, and tested against them.
This book should also form a useful introduction for students who want to learn how to get started with requirements.
This book specifically focuses on how to discover and express requirements. It is not about system specification, nor how to make a design that meets user needs, nor even about how users should ensure their requirements are met.Since users own the requirements, these must be expressed in a way users can understand. This book treats requirements as simple pieces of text, supported by operational scenarios and informal diagrams. Many attempts have been made to improve on these simple means, using more formal structures and notations with varying success. We have not tried to cover all these approaches.
To place requirements in context,the book must of course cover some aspects of the development process. Project management, verification, quality assurance, and the development life cycle are all closely linked with requirements n indeed each of these areas is meaningless in isolation. But in this book, we concentrate on the tasks of capturing and writing requirements. Each chapter contains exercises to help readers to practice their skills.
We recommend some good books for readers who want to go beyond writing good requirements to other aspects of systems and requirements engineering.
This book is meant to be read in the order in which it is written, taking the reader through a disciplined process of identifying, gathering, organizing, and reviewing. This is vital for success.
Each chapter introduces a stage in the requirements process. Key terms are defined informally, explained, and illustrated with examples and exercises to develop the practical skills of good requirements writing.
These skills involve looking at problems, dealing with people, looking critically at what is being written, and reviewing requirements effectively. Reviewing is to some extent a separate skill and can be looked at separately; the others belong together in a more or less strict sequence.
We begin by illustrating the importance of requirements. You may need this chapter to convince other people that they have a problem. Too many projects have poor requirements, and never recover. If you are already convinced, you can skip this introductory chapter.
We then show in a non-technical way how to define a problem, in close co-operation with the only people who know what the problem is, the users. The body of the book steps through the process, looking at:
All the chapters in the body of the book contain practical exercises for the reader. These are designed to take about half an hour each. Some are sufficiently open-ended for more extended self-instruction, or student projects. We recommend that readers attempt each exercise, at least briefly, to get an actual feeling for the difficulties involved. At the back of the book are short answers to all the questions, with hints to the reader for more complete projects.
If the message of this book can be stated in a sentence, it is:
Get agreement on what people want, before attempting to create solutions.
Finding out what is needed, instead of rushing into presumed solutions, is the key to every aspect of system development. Most technical problems can be solved, given determination, patience, a skilled team n and a good definition of the problem to be solved.
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers who checked the book so carefully; our wives and families for tolerating us while we wrote; and all our consultancy, training and workshop clients who experienced the material first-hand and showed us the way it needed to be explained. We are specially Richard Marshall for reading an early draft, and to Professor Ken Jackson for his perceptive and precise comments.
It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.
G. K. Chesterton
Requirements are the key to project success. We all know this, but we often forget n and pay the price. Many projects, both in industry and in the public sector, fail to do what is needed. They deliver late, over budget, and poor quality. Missing out on requirements is disastrous.
Writing Better Requirements is designed as a short, convenient overview for practising systems engineers and others who find they need to write requirements. Because it is about practical techniques, it should be useful in many different kinds of system and software project. We aim to enable readers to write requirements good enough for successful systems to be specified, designed, and tested against them.
This book should also form a useful introduction for students who want to learn how to get started with requirements.
This book specifically focuses on how to discover and express requirements. It is not about system specification, nor how to make a design that meets user needs, nor even about how users should ensure their requirements are met.Since users own the requirements, these must be expressed in a way users can understand. This book treats requirements as simple pieces of text, supported by operational scenarios and informal diagrams. Many attempts have been made to improve on these simple means, using more formal structures and notations with varying success. We have not tried to cover all these approaches.
To place requirements incontext, the book must of course cover some aspects of the development process. Project management, verification, quality assurance, and the development life cycle are all closely linked with requirements n indeed each of these areas is meaningless in isolation. But in this book, we concentrate on the tasks of capturing and writing requirements. Each chapter contains exercises to help readers to practice their skills.
We recommend some good books for readers who want to go beyond writing good requirements to other aspects of systems and requirements engineering.
This book is meant to be read in the order in which it is written, taking the reader through a disciplined process of identifying, gathering, organizing, and reviewing. This is vital for success.
Each chapter introduces a stage in the requirements process. Key terms are defined informally, explained, and illustrated with examples and exercises to develop the practical skills of good requirements writing.
These skills involve looking at problems, dealing with people, looking critically at what is being written, and reviewing requirements effectively. Reviewing is to some extent a separate skill and can be looked at separately; the others belong together in a more or less strict sequence.
We begin by illustrating the importance of requirements. You may need this chapter to convince other people that they have a problem. Too many projects have poor requirements, and never recover. If you are already convinced, you can skip this introductory chapter.
We then show in a non-technical way how to define a problem, in close co-operation with the only people who know what the problem is, the users. The body of the book steps through the process, looking at:
All the chapters in the body of the book contain practical exercises for the reader. These are designed to take about half an hour each. Some are sufficiently open-ended for more extended self-instruction, or student projects. We recommend that readers attempt each exercise, at least briefly, to get an actual feeling for the difficulties involved. At the back of the book are short answers to all the questions, with hints to the reader for more complete projects.
If the message of this book can be stated in a sentence, it is:
Get agreement on what people want, before attempting to create solutions.
Finding out what is needed, instead of rushing into presumed solutions, is the key to every aspect of system development. Most technical problems can be solved, given determination, patience, a skilled team n and a good definition of the problem to be solved.
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers who checked the book so carefully; our wives and families for tolerating us while we wrote; and all our consultancy, training and workshop clients who experienced the material first-hand and showed us the way it needed to be explained. We are specia to Richard Marshall for reading an early draft, and to Professor Ken Jackson for his perceptive and precise comments.
loading...
loading...
loading...
Terms of Use, Copyright, and Privacy Policy
© 1997-2009 Barnesandnoble.com llc