Enter a zip code
(Hardcover - First Edition)
The book that turns our understanding of motivation on its head . . . and shows why most companies get it wrong.
There are few people with more experience and accumulated wisdom about the inner workings of business and how people can work together more effectively than Jon Katzenbach.
Staff Favorite of 2003
Drawing upon his extensive study of high-performing organizations like Southwest Airlines, the U.S. Marines, and the new General Motors, a bestselling author offers a paradigm for understanding employee motivation that manages to be both revolutionary and amazingly self-evident: Feelings of pride generate higher performance. If you want to build a culture of excellence in your company, begin with this powerful book.
Why Pride Matters More Than Money is both inspirational and practical. It inspires you to challenge yourself and the people around you and provides the practical means for getting practical results from these challenges. It did something a great book should do by making me think about my life and my work, particularly the organizations I have helped and the teams I have led. More important, PRIDE has inspired me to make some changes in the way I impact other people, teams and organizations.
More Reviews and RecommendationsJon R. Katzenbach has been helping companies get extraordinary results from their employees for nearly fifty years. He was senior partner and director of McKinsey and Co.; he now directs his own firm, Katzenbach Partners LLC, a New York–based consulting firm that specializes in leadership, team building, and workforce performance. He is the author of Peak Performance and Teams at the Top and coauthor of The Wisdom of Teams and Real Change Leaders.
The book that turns our understanding of motivation on its head . . . and shows why most companies get it wrong.
There are few people with more experience and accumulated wisdom about the inner workings of business and how people can work together more effectively than Jon Katzenbach. His groundbreaking research has resulted in several important books, including The Wisdom of Teams and Real Change Leaders. Over the past several years he has turned his attention to one of the perennial questions of leaders everywhere: How do I motivate my employees?
Most everyone frets about how to devise schemes that will keep the troops revved up. Conventional wisdom—or at least the practice at most companies—often centers on money as the primary motivating force. Many also rely on intimidation, which like money generally has a short-term impact. But what Katzenbach has found in his research at many organizations is that both of these practices do little to build the long-term sustainability of an organization. For that you need a powerful force that has been—until this point—understood by few managers and implemented by fewer still: pride.
From the front lines to the executive suite, most people are motivated by feelings of accomplishment, approval, and camaraderie. It’s why the best employees strive well beyond performance levels that will yield them higher pay and why most true professionals relentlessly avoid retirement.
Why does Southwest Airlines consistently turn in the highest levels of performance and profitability of any company in the airline business? What can the U.S. Marines teach us about individualcommitment that can be used in the for-profit world? How is General Motors overcoming its history of labor-management enmity through the efforts of “pride-builders” from both the union and the management side? By drawing on what he has learned from these and many other organizations, Jon Katzenbach provides a practical program for understanding the role of pride:
• Money is not the motivator most people think it is: Katzenbach shows why pay-for-performance programs by themselves result in employees who focus on self-serving behavior and skin-deep organizational commitment.
• Money tends to be a short-term motivational device and works best during times of growth, but pride works in bad times as well as good.
• Cultivating pride is an investment that yields high returns on workforce performance over time and is not nearly as costly as relying solely on monetary compensation and the turnover risks that accompany a “show me the money” culture.
Katzenbach shares unique insights and specifics about how the best mid-level pride-builders take advantage of the world’s greatest motivational force even in environments as challenging as General Motors and Aetna. He shows how managers at every level are missing a powerful lever if they are not instilling pride as a primary force for building their organization.
Also available as an eBook.
Why Pride Matters More Than Money is both inspirational and practical. It inspires you to challenge yourself and the people around you and provides the practical means for getting practical results from these challenges. It did something a great book should do by making me think about my life and my work, particularly the organizations I have helped and the teams I have led. More important, PRIDE has inspired me to make some changes in the way I impact other people, teams and organizations.
Jon Katzenbach's research into what motivates people at work yields surprising insights with practical long-term benefits. While money has its place in any motivational program, what is far more important in building the long-term sustainability of an organization is pride. Pride in both one's work and in the organization as a whole and the sense of accomplishment, camaraderie and emotional attachment that comes with it is the key to success and beats a "show me the money" culture any day of the week.
Seek out your pride-builders -- they are the key to employee, business and profit growth. Mr. Katzenbach's book will certainly help you with your journey.
When people learn they're capable of much more than they thought possible, anticipatory pride becomes their driving motivational force, according to Katzenbach, the director of an eponymous consulting firm. The author of Peak Performance and The Wisdom of Teams gears his latest book towards companies and institutions wanting to inspire their employees, members or participants with primarily non-financial incentives (team spirit, camaraderie and excitement, for example). "Money by itself is likely to produce self-serving behavior and skin-deep organizational commitment rather than...institution-building behavior," Katzenbach asserts. Citing specific case studies, Katzenbach considers companies and institutions such as General Motors and its diverse management programs and the U.S. Marine Corps' emphasis on honor and courage. Employee recognition, he says, is a crucial element of any campaign to bolster group morale. A Microsoft employee, for example, likes to tell people that "we work on products that everyone is likely to use, and I mean everyone. More than one hundred million people use Office, my product. People will stop me in the middle of a conversation and say, 'You worked on that [feature]?' It's instant respect." The lure of monetary reward may always be a primary motivation for employees, but in clear and persuasive prose, Katzenbach cautions that because most of the rank and file cannot hope to compete with those at the top, other, less tangible motivations must propel group successes. (Apr.) Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information.
CHAPTER 1
PERFORMANCE, SUCCESS, AND PRIDE
Pride is the emotional high that follows performance and
success. The more interesting proposition, however, is that simple recollections
of past "wins" and an empathy for the pride we sense in others (e.g., watching a
sibling receive a special award) produce an anticipation of future "successes"
that motivates performance. Moreover, success is in the eye of the beholder;
people view and calibrate success in different ways. Those who recognize these
different connections often develop the ability to motivate people to higher
levels of performance, both by the way they define "success" and by how they
instill pride along the way. Unfortunately, instilling pride in others is easier
to do in some environments than in others.
I first uncovered the power of the "closed loop of
emotional energy" in an obvious place: high-performing workforces at Southwest
Airlines, Marriott, the U.S. Marine Corps, and Microsoft. Pride is a natural
by-product of the successes of those organizations. It is fairly common for
their managers and leaders to draw upon pride as an ongoing source of
motivation; those feelings are easy to come by. Yet what about companies that
have historically not been remarkably successful? Can pride precipitate higher
performance in those environments as well?
Certainly, the answer is yes--but it happens less
frequently and is more difficult than in the perennial achievers. Not
surprisingly, therefore, prospective "pride-builders" can usually learn more
about how to instill the pride that leads to higher performance from the proven
pride-builders in more traditional environments than from those in
peak-performing environments. The difference, of course, is that in companies
that experience perennial successes, pride follows naturally; in other
organizations, pride-builders have to apply their ingenuity to instill pride
during periods of low or sporadic business success.
PRIDE GENERATES HIGHER PERFORMANCE
We know that pride is a primary source of energy and
emotional commitment in enterprises that consistently outperform their
competition.1 While it is less obvious perhaps, we find clear evidence in
traditional large companies that those managers who excel at instilling pride in
their workers also deliver higher levels of both economic and market performance
over time than their peers. For example, we asked the Manufacturing Managers
Council at General Motors to identify twenty of the best "pride-builders" in
GM's North American Manufacturing organization. Our case studies of these plant
managers confirmed their reliance on pride as a primary source of motivation
(described in more detail in chapter 6).
General Motors regularly measures its plants on five basic
elements of performance: safety, people satisfaction, product quality,
responsiveness to customers, and cost. When we compared the performance of the
twenty plants of those managers along each of these important metrics, their
results consistently exceeded that of their peers. Specifically, the
pride-builders outscored other plants on an index comparison by 83 to 65 on
safety, 79 to 69 on people satisfaction, 53 to 47 on quality, and 69 to 65 on
cost. Only on responsiveness did the pride-builder index fall short, and that
was caused by a model changeover at one plant plus the start-up of another
during this period.
While it is always difficult to separate the "chicken and
egg" aspects of performance results and feelings of pride, the best motivators
believe that instilling pride is what enables them to get higher levels of
performance from their people. Of the over fifty pride-builders we have studied
during the last two years, all deliver superior performance results for their
enterprise--and all attribute their success to an ability to instill pride among
their people before the fact, i.e., before business success is assured and final
results can be determined.
A BROAD SPECTRUM
Human motivation is a moving target. Since everyone's
personal circumstances change over time, we are motivated by different things at
different stages in our life. We each define success in different ways and take
pride in doing different things well. As a result, the sources of pride that
motivate us cover a fairly broad spectrum, some of which produce "good" results
for the enterprises we work for and some of which produce "bad" results. In
describing this spectrum, it is useful to categorize the sources of pride into
two basic groups: self-serving and institution-building. Clearly, neither
category is completely good or bad in terms of results for the enterprise. For
example, self-serving pride can motivate a person to work hard to keep her job,
earn more money, and influence more people to help her. These motivations are typically good for
the enterprise. However, self-serving pride can also motivate people to pursue
money and material possessions as well as power and position above all else.
When these motives lead to the exploitation of others for personal gain, the
enterprise suffers.
Similarly, institution-building pride can motivate people
behaviors that are bad for the enterprise. For example, an overemphasis on
individual skill development and "teaming" can cause people to take pride in
goals that supersede company priorities, create "marketable resume" profiles,
and pursue undisciplined teaming efforts in ways that are costly and confusing.
Good results accrue to the enterprise only when the emphasis is on individual
and group efforts that fit with organizational priorities and enhance long-term
business success. The best leaders and managers will influence people to take
pride in achieving personal goals that align with company goals, building skills
that match company needs, and creating teams that achieve important business
results. Institution-building pride typically favors the long-term success of an
enterprise more than self-serving pride. Nonetheless, the challenge for any
leadership system is to integrate sources of pride that will optimize the "good"
motivational results and minimize "bad" motivational results--simply stated, to
make sure that institution-building pride counterbalances self-serving
pride.
Moreover, the forces that motivate us tend to shift
depending on our personal needs as well as where we stand in the organizational
hierarchy. Abraham Maslow's classic hierarchy of needs remains hard to dispute;
the basic need for food and physical protection comes first. If you are stranded
on a desert island like Robinson Crusoe or Tom Hanks in the movie Castaway, you
are motivated by the need to survive until you can be rescued.
Beyond the survival imperative, however, we are motivated
to provide safety and comfort for ourselves and our family. Only then, as Maslow
clarified, do we seek fulfillment as individuals and as members of societal
groups. Ultimately, we want to both
"stand out as an individual" as well as "be part of groups we respect"--but
these are secondary motivators as long as survival, safety, and comfort are at
issue. While seldom finite, our creature comfort needs can usually be defined in
monetary terms, although everyone seeks a different level of comfort. And when
comfort is replaced by luxury on the need scale, wealth creation becomes a
primary motivator.
After all, accumulating wealth "beyond basic need" is
perhaps one of the great entrepreneurial pastimes. The Horatio Alger dream is
alive and well. Every person is
assumed to be free to earn whatever he or she can. Since promotions are
invariably calibrated in monetary terms, the more your job pays, the more
important you feel. The harder you work, the more money you expect to earn, and
the more material possessions you can accumulate. The more you accumulate, the
more attention you can expect to attract from friends, neighbors, and
colleagues. This kind of expectation is motivating for many people. As a result,
it is hardly surprising that Americans are working longer than ever before and
probably put in more on-the-job hours than people in any other industrial
society.
Money is the way to accumulate possessions that enable us
to rise on the scoreboard of comparative achievement. "Keeping up with the
Joneses" motivates many people. A more sensible motivation is that of working
hard now to avoid having to work later in life. Moving up Maslow's hierarchy of
needs is a natural human proposition--and money is the basic enabler. Thus,
focusing on earning more money is a natural incentive that is widely employed by
organizations that can afford it. However, it is seldom as powerful or lasting a
motivator as intrinsic or institution-building pride. Those feelings generated
by earnings can have a hollow ring if people do not admire us for other
reasons.
These other reasons reflect other human needs that are
simply not well defined by monetary wealth. They are the intrinsic or humanistic
needs that spur people to try for their "personal best" or to seek their full
potential, to be associated with colleagues they admire and respect, and to
contribute to the well-being of others. Striving to meet these needs produces
feelings of pride that are motivating--and usually completely independent of
whatever monetary value society might establish. Whatever makes people feel
proud of their efforts invariably explains their motivation to excel. Most of us
work hardest at those tasks that make us feel proud based upon our personal
values or beliefs. For some people, the amount of money they earn is the best
way to evaluate how they are doing relative to others. For others, their
recognized role in business and society is the best way. Many people, however,
labor in ways that are not particularly lucrative or easily recognizable by
title or position. They must rely on whatever reinforces feelings of intrinsic
pride in what they do, how they do it, with and for whom they do it, and what it
means to others whom they respect. For motivational purposes, it is useful to
differentiate between self-serving and institution-building
pride.
SELF-SERVING PRIDE
This kind of pride encompasses both power and materialism,
and the latter is primarily a game of "show me the money"--and the more you can
earn, accumulate, and visibly deploy, the better. People who play this game well
focus their attention on whatever will reward them the most monetarily, and
whatever will position them to control the most resources (human and economic).
Hence, they are likely to shift their allegiances to whatever organizations or
occupational pursuits offer the highest monetary compensation, promise the
greatest wealth-accumulation opportunities, and thereby provide the most
personal recognition and influence. Not surprisingly, these people are usually
the first to leave an organization or occupation when economic returns start to
falter. Loyalty and commitment play secondary roles in their
motivation.
The disturbing collapse of Enron in 2001 provided a glaring
example of how the unrelenting pursuit of monetary gain and personal power can
lead intelligent executives astray and quickly erode institutional balance. Fortune magazine called it a "debacle of
arrogance and greed." The Enron story, of course, is much more complex than that
phrase would suggest, and many factors were involved in the company's downfall.
From a motivational point of view, however, two important lessons emerge from
the Enron story:
(1) the pursuit of financial gain as the primary motivator
promotes arrogant behavior and unwarranted risk-taking, and (2) that pursuit
leads to an overreliance on individual achievement and personal power that
rarely sustains enterprise-wide performance over time.
But Enron is an extreme example of self-serving pride out
of control. Let's consider the less extreme case of Anil Xavier (disguised
name), who was employed by BMC, an early contender in the software business in
Texas. When I interviewed Anil for research on my previous book, Peak
Performance, he was a highly regarded software designer for BMC. The key to
their early success could be found in two segments of their workforce: the
senior account sales representatives (some of whom made more money than the CEO)
and the "product authors" or software designers. These two groups were highly
motivated examples of entrepreneurialism in action: employees engaged in
high-risk, high-reward challenges that offered the promise of personal financial
independence.
Anil was proud that he earned more than $1 million
annually, owned a Jaguar convertible, and could easily afford to charter a
private plane to take his family on annual ski vacations at Vail. During the
interview, he focused his remarks strictly on the commercial results of his
products, i.e., the economic return. Little mention was made of the quality of
his design work, the caliber of his colleagues, or the reactions of his
customers beyond their willingness to pay high prices. Anil is no longer with
BMC, having left the company for a better-paying opportunity when his bonus was
reduced shortly after BMC encountered an economic downturn. Like most people who
thrive on materialistic pride, he was quick to move on to a higher bidder and
showed little commitment to riding out the downturn with BMC.
There is little question that high levels of individual
achievement are motivated by ego as well as self-serving pride. And in some
situations, such as individual sports or artistic pursuits, such motivations are
both powerful and appropriate. During 2001 and 2002, Jennifer Capriati was rated
the top female tennis player in the world. She had to work hard to reach that
level, coming back from her disappointing early years on the professional tennis
tour. She was also highly motivated to stay at that level and takes great pride
in getting to and being at the top of her chosen profession. An article in the
June 2, 2002, issue of the New York Times describes this
challenge:
At times, the strain on Capriati has been visible. She has
yelled expletives at umpires and complained about fans. To some tennis
officials, Capriati has appeared fragile in her desire to make her moment last
as long as possible. Privately,
those officials feel the pressure led to the profane tirade she directed at
Billie Jean King last month. After King dismissed her from the Fed Cup team for
her refusal to conform to team practice rules, Capriati lashed out at the
captain and caretaker of the women's tour. With the French Open looming,
Capriati felt her practice routine superseded team rules.
Structure and simplicity have been the foundation of
Capriati's return. Even for Fed Cup, Capriati was not about to change her
approach to tennis. It was an act of selfishness on Capriati's part, but so be
it. With that backdrop, it was not surprising when Capriati agreed with a recent
comment from John McEnroe concerning the self-centered nature and ego top
[tennis] players need to drive them to the top and keep them
there.
"I think ego is pride," Capriati said. "To get to the top,
you have to have a
lot of pride. That's not giving up. At the Australian Open
for me this year,
that was pride and ego and I didn't want to lose. If you
don't have that,
you're not a champion, you're not a fighter. . . . I would
have to say you
have to be a little bit selfish just because there's so much
that requires
being done."2
For the most part, professional tennis is an individual
sport. Hence, self-serving pride is the primary motivational force. When a team
aspect of the sport (e.g., the Fed Cup) comes into play, however, there is also
a real need for institution-building pride to take over; otherwise the team will
come apart. The same holds true for business enterprises. Unless self-serving
pride is wisely counterbalanced by institution-building pride, the performance
of the enterprise will suffer.
loading...
loading...
loading...
Terms of Use, Copyright, and Privacy Policy
© 1997-2008 Barnesandnoble.com llc