Enter a zip code
(Hardcover - Bargain)
Note: This is a bargain book and quantities are limited. Bargain books are new but may have slight markings from the publisher and/or stickers showing their discounted price. More about bargain books
We all have an imaginary definition of a great family. We imagine what it would be like to belong to such a family. No fights over the holidays. No getting on one another’s nerves. Respect for individual identity. Mutual support, without being intrusive. So many people believe they are disqualified from having a better family experience, primarily because they compare their own family with the mythic ideal, and their reality falls short. Is that a fair standard to judge against?”
In the pages of Why Do I Love These People?, Po Bronson takes us on an extraordinary journey.
It begins on a river in Texas, where a mother gets trapped underwater and has to bargain for her own life and that of her kids.
Then, a father and his daughter return to their tiny rice-growing village in China, hoping to rekindle their love for each other inside the walls of his childhood home.
Next, a son puts forth a riddle, asking us to understand what his first experience of God has to do with his Mexican American mother.
Every step–and every family–on this journey is real.
Calling upon his gift for powerful nonfiction narrative and philosophical insight, Bronson explores the incredibly complicated feelings that we have for our families. Each chapter introduces us to two people–a father and his son, a daughter and her mother, a wife and her husband–and we come to know them as intimately as characters in a novel, following the story of their relationship as they struggle resiliently through the kinds of hardships all families endure.
Some of the people manage to save their relationship, while others find a better life only afterletting the relationship go. From their efforts, the wisdom in this book emerges. We are left feeling emotionally raw but grounded–and better prepared to love, through both hard times and good time.
In these twenty mesmerizing stories, we discover what is essential and elemental to all families and, in doing so, slowly abolish the fantasies and fictions we have about those we fight to stay connected to.
In Why Do I Love These People?, Bronson shows us that we are united by our yearnings and aspirations: Family is not our dividing line, but our common ground.
Bronson is no Pollyanna; he tells stories about himself that reveal his own compulsion to "succeed," to be "better," but he reminds himself and us repeatedly that those aren't the things that count. Love and decency and self-control count. And the integrity of his prose style as well as the incredible sweetness of those he writes about give him 24-karat credibility.
More Reviews and RecommendationsAlthough it took him some time to find his literary niche, Po Bronson has settled into his role as “social documentarian” with great ease, penning two books that have become tremendous commercial, critical, and personal successes in the process.
More About the Author
Name:
Po Bronson
Current Home:
San Francisco, California
Date of Birth:
March 14, 1964
Place of Birth:
Seattle, Washington
Education:
B.A., Stanford University, 1986; M.F.A., San Francisco State University, 1995
Po Bronson is the rare writer that makes no claims to having an extraordinary or controversial history. On his web site, he states, "I'm a regular guy. I don't have much of a particularly unusual story." While some may assume such a description might not be the makings of a person with any stories worth telling, it actually provides the perfect background for a writer such as Bronson. He has made it his mission to relate the stories of his fellow everyday people, and with books such as What Should I Do With My Life? and Why Do I Love These People?, he has proved that ordinary people can lead extraordinary lives.
A prolific writer with a talent well-suited for a variety of genres, Bronson started out dabbling in screenplays, op-eds, TV and radio scripts, performance monologues, and literary reviews, and his first two books were satirical novels. Bombardiers (1995) was a sort of Catch 22 set in the bond-trading business; The First $20 Million Is Always the Hardest: A Silicon Valley Novel, Vol. 4 (1997) a tale about the West Coast tech boom of the late 1990's. With his third book, The Nudist on the Late Shift: And Other Tales of Silicon Valley, he turned his focus away from fiction and toward the true stories of the tech-heads he encountered while working as a writer in Silicon Valley. Hailed by The Village Voice Literary Supplement upon its publication as "the most complete and empathetic portrait of the Valley so far," the breakout bestseller established Bronson as the first author to truly capture the spirit of the high-tech heyday.
In writing What Should I Do With My Life? (2003), Bronson posed that very question to a variety of regular folks all around the globe. The result: a rich and fascinating compendium of inspirational, witty, and insightful personal stories about finding one's direction, vocational and otherwise. The book was a tremendous success, and Bronson had clearly found his niche. Why Do I Love These People? followed in late 2005. This time around, Bronson questioned a multitude of people about illness, resolving familial conflicts, infidelity, prejudice, money problems, abuse, death, and other provocative issues, once again illustrating that one need not be a celebrity to lead a life worth reading about. Among others, Bronson encounters a Southern Baptist in the Ozarks who tracks down the teenage son he had abandoned at birth, a woman who fought for her life and the life of her children while trapped underwater in a Texas river, and a Turkish Muslim who wed a U.S. naval officer -- a union resulting in death threats from her own father.
Bronson characterizes his recent books as "social documentaries," but he doesn't rule out returning to the other genres he's loved. He does, however, credit his recent work with one important feature: "I used to write novels, and maybe I will again one day," he told BN.com in an audio interview, "but I have found that writing these social documentaries is good for me as a person."
Some fun factoids gleaned from our interview with Bronson:
"Well, when I look upon what I've written to the below questions, there's a lot on how I became a writer, but not much on how I came to write the books I have been doing the last six years. I write social documentaries, in which I tell the life stories of ordinary people. I used to write novels, and maybe I will again one day. But I have found that writing these social documentaries is good for me as a person; they make me a better person. I put myself in a position where I need to listen and learn from other people I interview. And even if the books were not successes, I would be a better person just for doing so much listening."
"Okay, I realize now that's now what you were really asking. It sounds like you want personal details -- you want to know me through my lists: my lists of books, films, music, restaurants I eat at, hobbies I enjoy. I'm not sure that's the best way to know the soul of a person, because it kind of suggests that who we are = what we consume. However, I'll answer, by all means. Here we go:
What was the book that most influenced your life or your career as a writer?
It would be untruthful of me to pin it all on one book, so let me describe how a few books have saved me at different times as I've matured. At each of these junctions, I was facing a decision in my creative direction.
1989. I had been writing at night for a couple years. I was wondering whether it was worth it. I had applied to a night-program in Creative Writing at our local state school, and I was unsure whether to attend -- where this might take me. Certainly, it would take me away from the working world I felt practical and safe in. Then I read Ethan Canin's first story collection, Emperor of the Air. The beauty and grace of the book stunned me, and in its pages I found an indescribable answer as to why to pursue such an impractical dream.
1993. I had been writing short stories for four years. They were decent and well crafted, but I felt trapped by the conventions of straightforward, chronological narrative. I was suffocating inside my stories and my characters. Another way to say it is, I was letting only a little of myself into my fictional realms. There was no humor in my work, no anger, no politics, and no ideas. Then I read Catch-22. It allowed me to put my whole self into my writing, to unleash my personality and my anger.
1998. With two successful novels under my belt, it was occurring to me that I was going to have to do something for money between writing novels. The magazines were calling. I didn't consider non-fiction to be my art form. Then I read Tom Wolfe's The Right Stuff, and the whole realm of non-fiction became my new playground of experimentation.
2001. Six years after "turning pro," I once again started to feel like my writing paled compared to the life around me. In particular, I grew tired of my relentless ironic dark humor. I had stopped making fun of people years earlier, in my personal life -- why was I still doing it in print? I was hungry for a compassionate voice, a voice that respected people, treasured them. I found it in Irvin Yalom's Love's Executioner, his book of nonfiction tales of psychotherapy. The way he loved his subjects allowed me to do the same in my writing.
What are your ten favorite books, and what makes them special to you?
I just listed four. They're so good that sometimes I wish I had never read them, just so I could have the pleasure of discovering them all over again. Six more I feel that way about:
As for why, all I can say is I turned the pages as fast as they could come, and they humbled me, and they inspired me to keep writing.
What types of music do you like? Is there any particular kind you like to listen to when you're writing?
Ha ha. Few readers will know these references, but I would characterize these bands as urban hipster listening, eloquent guys with guitars with an occasional female at the mic. I see a lot of live music at small clubs. Okay, tonight I'm going to see Wolf Parade, they're a Montreal band on tour. I've been listening to them constantly. I've also been listening to The Magic Numbers. While writing Why Do I Love These People?, I listened to a half dozen albums, most prominently Stars Set Yourself on Fire, (another Canadian band), The Wrens Meadowlands (from Jersey, obviously) and Fivehead's Guests of the Natio (from Austin). Any one of these bands could be the next Modest Mouse or Death Cab.
Perhaps of more interest to the reader: I write with headphones on my ears (well, ear buds), and I crank it, and I use the repeat button. I will listen to the same song for a week or more. It becomes a sort of mood-setter, and energizer, but a pleasant white noise that almost disappears. It helps me concentrate when I'm in my writing closet (What? A writing closet? More on that below!).
If you had a book club, what would it be reading?
This is a hard question for me. I've never been in a book club. I'm not sure exactly what happens in one. I've attended two in my life -- once it was my own novel being talked about, and another time it was a female book club and so I was only allowed to be present for half of it. So it's a great mystery to me what goes on in one. But I have been in year after year or writer's workshops, and writers discussing literary work do so quite differently than it is done in an English class -- we talk less about what's there, but rather how it can be a little bit better than it already is. We are supportive as we can. Basically, I hated English class, I hated the way they talked about books, it seemed so unnatural. So maybe from that, I have a mild fear that a book club might be like an English Class, and it scares me away.
Do you have any special writing rituals? For example, what do you have on your desk when you're writing?
I write in a closet. Literally. I'm on my fifth closet. They are small, tight, and dark. I don't recommend it for anyone with claustrophobia, but I do recommend it as the best way to avoid all distractions. My first closet was the smallest -- it was 2 feet by 3.5 feet. The only light comes from the laptop screen. I spend most of all day in there when I am in a writing phase.
If it sounds somewhat deranged, please know that for the last ten years, my closets haven't been at home. We founded a cooperative writing space in San Francisco, where every writer has a private room. It costs about $250 a month. We are on our fourth location. The first location had 6 writers; today we have 32 working here. So whenever I pop out of my closet, three or four times a day, there are other writers to chew the fat with and eat lunch with. So I don't write in a closet because I'm antisocial. I write in a closet because I'm naturally social, and I need the isolation chamber to cut off distraction. Our website is www.sfgrotto.org.
Many writers are hardly "overnight success" stories. How long did it take for you to get where you are today? Any rejection-slip horror stories or inspirational anecdotes?
I have a series of essays on my web site about my process of becoming a writer, which are too long to reprint here. So I will pass on this one crucial idea. I want you aspiring writers to keep this in mind.
You hear all the time about slush piles of manuscripts, how editors are inundated, so much so that they don't even look at their piles anymore. Many houses don't even accept un-agented manuscripts. So you feel despair at the numbers, and this sick thought occurs to you: even if I write a great book, will anyone be there to notice it? Once this thought gets hold, it eats at you, makes you doubt yourself, slow down, stop. Well, I used to work in small press publishing, and I know a ton of New York editors, and so I've seen it from both sides. Let me assure you: editors are dying for a great manuscript. They have piles of mediocre manuscripts, but they would do anything for a rare, great, new, original voice. These editors live in a fishbowl, Manhattan, and it's very status-driven. The way you get status in that world is by having the hot new book. An editor would rather buy something special and exciting than a work that is super proficient and polished but lacking in uniqueness.
All of the editors I know -- and I know a ton -- are dying to find a great book. They can't find manuscripts worth buying. That's how they think. By no means do they feel like they are gatekeepers or kingmakers. They're desperate. If you write something great, they will find it.
If you could choose one new writer to be "discovered," who would it be?
I have to laugh again. The last time a publication asked me to discover a new book, it was People magazine and the book I picked was James Frey's A Million Little Pieces. Four million copies later (all thanks to Oprah, not to me)....
Okay, here's a wonderful novel that was completely overlooked -- a novel by my friend Noah Hawley, called Other People's Weddings. It's the story of a female wedding photographer who's divorced and jaded, until she realizes, in going through her wedding prints, that one guy keeps appearing at all these weddings. He's a wedding crasher. They fall in love, of course, and then have to let go of their skepticism about love. It's a short novel you can read in a few hours.
What tips or advice do you have for writers still looking to be discovered?
Don't be jealous of others' success. Jealousy and envy are the enemy of genuine creativity. Wish others well and hope to join them someday.
To be writing is good for the soul; it's good for your character -- to be observing, interpreting, producing (not just consuming). Pay attention to this. It's very important. Success is not measured by bestseller lists. Certain types of great books sell very well; other types of great books don't sell a lot. A great thriller might sell a million copies. A great poetry book might sell a few hundred copies. But they're both great.
Allow for many paths to your goal. Do not fixate on one path, because then you are likely to give up when that path is blocked.
It takes an average of ten years dedication before you can make a living writing creatively full time. Even those who succeed early are often rewarded with praise too early, trapping them in a yet-to-mature phase as they attempt to repeat their success. It all evens out over time. Finding a way to allow yourself the time, to buy time as you mature into your writing, is the biggest "how to."
In 2002, Po Bronson's What Should I Do With My Life? posed the titular question to dozens of "real people in the real world." In this book, he queries "common folk" about equally important matters: How do families who have experienced years of conflict make the transition to a better place, a place of hope, mutual respect, and appreciation? How do we deal with illness, infidelity, money, abuse, assimilation, prejudice, intrusiveness, aloofness, divorce, and death? He finds his answers in the heart-wrenching stories of disparate people, ranging from a Southern Baptist in the Ozarks who tracks down the 13-year-old son he abandoned at birth to a Turkish Muslim woman who marries an officer in the U.S. Navy despite a death threat from her father. Stunning and profound.
We all have an imaginary definition of a great family. We imagine what it would be like to belong to such a family. No fights over the holidays. No getting on one another’s nerves. Respect for individual identity. Mutual support, without being intrusive. So many people believe they are disqualified from having a better family experience, primarily because they compare their own family with the mythic ideal, and their reality falls short. Is that a fair standard to judge against?”
In the pages of Why Do I Love These People?, Po Bronson takes us on an extraordinary journey.
It begins on a river in Texas, where a mother gets trapped underwater and has to bargain for her own life and that of her kids.
Then, a father and his daughter return to their tiny rice-growing village in China, hoping to rekindle their love for each other inside the walls of his childhood home.
Next, a son puts forth a riddle, asking us to understand what his first experience of God has to do with his Mexican American mother.
Every step–and every family–on this journey is real.
Calling upon his gift for powerful nonfiction narrative and philosophical insight, Bronson explores the incredibly complicated feelings that we have for our families. Each chapter introduces us to two people–a father and his son, a daughter and her mother, a wife and her husband–and we come to know them as intimately as characters in a novel, following the story of their relationship as they struggle resiliently through the kinds of hardships all families endure.
Some of the people manage to save their relationship, while others find a better life only afterletting the relationship go. From their efforts, the wisdom in this book emerges. We are left feeling emotionally raw but grounded–and better prepared to love, through both hard times and good time.
In these twenty mesmerizing stories, we discover what is essential and elemental to all families and, in doing so, slowly abolish the fantasies and fictions we have about those we fight to stay connected to.
In Why Do I Love These People?, Bronson shows us that we are united by our yearnings and aspirations: Family is not our dividing line, but our common ground.
Bronson is no Pollyanna; he tells stories about himself that reveal his own compulsion to "succeed," to be "better," but he reminds himself and us repeatedly that those aren't the things that count. Love and decency and self-control count. And the integrity of his prose style as well as the incredible sweetness of those he writes about give him 24-karat credibility.
The 19 families profiled in this absorbing book face a familiar litany of domestic dysfunction: infidelities, substance abuse, teen pregnancy, messy divorces and the intergenerational estrangement of immigrants. Novelist and social documentarian Bronson (What Should I Do with My Life?) finds the solutions to their dilemmas in the good old-fashioned elements of character and action, as people take stock of themselves and their motivations and painstakingly piece together their relationships and lives. Bronson's is an unromantic view of family life; its foundations, he believes, are not soul-mate bonding or dramatic emotional catharses, but steady habits of hard work and compromise, realistic expectations and the occasional willingness to sever a relationship that's beyond repair. But he also has an optimistic view of today's crazy-quilt of blended and unconventional families, reassuring commitment-shy young adults that "the golden era of family is not in our past, it's in our future." Bronson occasionally lapses into shallow pop psychology, as when he chalks up one husband's philandering to the oxytocin "high" caused by sex with someone new. But usually he offers a probing, clear-eyed, hopeful narrative of familial problems that many readers will recognize. Photos. Agent, Peter Ginsburg at Curtis Brown. (On sale Nov. 15) Copyright 2005 Reed Business Information.
Through sharing the in-depth stories of 17 families (out of the 700 interviewed), best-selling author Bronson (What Should I Do with My Life?) illuminates the meaning of family and increases our understanding of how to improve family relationships. The subjects of his stories are ordinary people who have grown and prospered-sometimes in spite of backgrounds that include poverty, destructive childhoods, and divorce-and who challenge the current notion that families today are in trouble and in worse condition than ever before owing to infidelity, illness, substance abuse, and other afflictions. Indeed, Bronson draws on statistics and historical research to show that there is much promise. Photos appear throughout, and references are included. Bronson's latest espouses a positive message that readers can use to better their own situations. Recommended for public and university libraries. [See Prepub Alert, LJ 7/05.]-Kay Brodie, Chesapeake Coll., Wye Mills, MD Copyright 2005 Reed Business Information.
The Cook's Story
We've all lost something along the way.
In Jennifer Louie's case, what she had lost was a belief that her family was a fundamentally essential thing, a meaningful purpose worth her devotion, a principle on which to build her life. Family is like Religion: There are all kinds, but when you get right down to it, you either believe, or you're not sure, or you think it's a crock of hooey. Jen had lost her belief. She had it in China, and she lost it when she came to America. These things happen--she was moving on. She was in the right place to lose it: The United States of America has seventy-six million great families with roots around the world, but it's also one of the best places in which to move on after losing belief. It can be done here. Those "Not Sure" have plenty of company.
Then, unexpectedly, it came back. Her belief. It came back when she got to know her father, James, but not as her father, just as a man, a human being with feelings. She found herself loving him again, with a respect she'd not had in twenty years.
This is their story.
I had actually met Jennifer before.
"Do you remember?" she asked.
"I still have your old business card," I recalled truthfully. We would bump into each other at a South of Market club where my best friend and I used to swing-dance. What I remembered about Jen was that she spoke very directly about her emerging career as a television producer. She was ambitious and sharp. And this was memorable, because we were in a club where (1) businessy career conversations seemed out of place, not to mention hard to hear, and (2) Jen was working as a Lucky Strike cigarette girl, in costume, giving away cigarettes. Her second job. It was amusing to listen to the beautiful, fiercely independent Chinese Lucky Strike girl going on about her successful day job for a cable channel in the big city. It always stuck in my memory, a multiculti Mary Tyler Moore moment. Yes, she was in Lucky Strike costume, but she moved around the nightclub with the body language of a manager in an office, armed with business cards, never missing a chance to network. When she mentioned her family, she always painfully waved the topic away. "They just don't get me," she would say, or "They don't approve of what I'm doing with my life," or "They're living their life, I'm living mine." Unable to please them, she'd stopped trying. She treasured her career passion like a good secret, it being the only part of her life that was hers alone to ruin or shape into something grand.
Then, one day some six years later, after I made a presentation at a business conference (about the heroic courage required to find a meaningful career, no less), Jennifer came up to me, wondering if I remembered her. She said she'd just moved back from New York. There was something different about her, a peacefulness to equal her confidence. It intrigued me. We agreed to meet for a glass of wine after work the next week.
With Jen, there's so much to attract the eye. She puts the double H in hip-hop. Blond streaks highlight her black hair. A mountain lion tooth dangles from her leather choker. Metallic powder-blue eyeshadow, umber lip liner, and rose-tinted sunglasses add color to her visage. Pin-striped pants, a snug T-shirt, and black boots with two-inch heels proudly show off her curves. But while I noticed these details, my eye fixed on the one accessory that didn't fit. On her left wrist was a delicate bracelet of beaded hooks, with a single gold heart dangling from the chain. It was solid gold, but somehow raw--shiny, but without the luster of contemporary jewelry. It looked fragile. This was not the sort of bracelet folks bought in Soho. An heirloom?
"Is it a locket?" I asked, referring to the single gold heart.
"No, it's not a locket," Jen answered, "but it's very perceptive of you to notice this, of all things. It never leaves my wrist."
"There's more to it than that, I can tell from your voice."
"I didn't see this bracelet for twenty years. Now a whole story is represented to me by this bracelet."
A locket after all.
Over the next year I spent many afternoons with Jen and her father, James. He's fifty-three, relaxed in the face, but often looks down in contemplation. He is not a formal man; sometimes I found him in a Sacramento Kings T-shirt and flip-flops, at other times in an open-necked dress shirt and dress slacks, but shoeless. We laughed together, and hugged unself-consciously, which was not something Jen had seen him do with anyone in America except his immediate family. I think of physical affection as a sort of fourth dimension: You can get through life without ever knowing it's there, but it sure adds something to the experience when you open up to it. I guess James was demonstrative with me as a way of reaching across the limitations of language. When narrating facts, he spoke Cantonese, with Jen translating, saving his sparse and humble English for the very few concepts or feelings he was desperate to communicate. Often he needed to say it to Jen once, get the English translation from her, shake that off like a pitcher might a catcher's sign, modify it, test a better word on Jen, and then be the one who delivered this translation to me, warm from the oven of his heart. When communication slows down--when the data rate slows down--we can feel more. In fact, it was my practice to go over the same material repeatedly, often forcing a source to retell the story five to eight times until he had lost track of his codified "safe" version and was spilling out untapped rememberances that made him feel it all again.
At one point James had said something that made him laugh almost silently to himself. Because laughter is infectious among friends, I giggled impulsively.
"What'd he say?" I asked Jen.
She repeated in English, amused, "This must be a world record."
"For what?"
"For the longest anyone has ever listened to a fry cook."
Before leaving China, they had hid the gold.
The gold had been forged into necklaces, bracelets, and rings. Their fortune fit into the flat, round plastic cases of two powder compacts, their makeshift treasure chest. One of the bracelets was a family heirloom passed down from a great-grandmother--a string of beaded hooks with a single small gold heart dangling off the chain. It fell over on itself in a double loop in the compact case. A fold of silk kept the jewelry from rattling.
It's traditional for migrating families to convert their savings to gold, since it's a reliable currency accepted everywhere. But James Louie didn't bring the gold with him to California. He brought all his cash, five hundred dollars, but he hid the gold in the house he was leaving. In this moment--in this very untraditional and revealing decision--what heartwarming, charmingly hopeless love of home! James Louie stashed the gold because he fully intended to come back. Frequently! He anticipated making enough money in America to return every few summers on vacation. The house he, his son, and his daughter had been born in--a brick-and-cinder hovel in the rice commune of Tai San (house number 18 in case you're ever in the neighborhood)--would become his summer home. While there was no plumbing whatsoever (they scooped water from the river) and no stove (cooking instead over small fires of fig leaves and branches), the house had been supplied with electrical current ten years before, and recently James had wired a television--the only one in the village. On Thursday nights James's daughter, Jennifer, all of eight years old, would sell tickets to people from neighboring villages to watch the only Chinese television show they could receive.
James had farmed rice almost every day of his twenty-nine-year life in a village where barter, not money, was the primary currency. He had been to high school, where he had met his wife, Kim, but that was it. His peasant's life did not resemble that of the doctors and academicians who had been thrown into the rice fields during the Cultural Revolution, torn from their children and spouses. Even if James--like everyone else--wanted a ticket out, communism had never scarred his family. Occasionally the communists showed up and hauled away the stored rice. They were not an everyday presence. They let James plant vegetables in an unclaimed corner of a field and keep a pigsty and chicken coop across the street. James Louie was a simple man. His love for Tai San was not complicated.
So he ordered the pots to be left hanging from their hooks. He told his family to take some clothes, but to leave others folded neatly in chests. The heart and soul of the home was an altar of framed photographs of family members going back a few generations, with James's mother dominating in the middle. He harvested very little from the altar, only the smallest mementos.
"I will be back, Mother," he said, bowing before her photo.
This was July 1980. He was in southern China, 120 miles from Canton City, 200 miles from Hong Kong, 7,100 miles from California.
He slipped the gold into the red compacts and pried loose a wood panel from the brick. Jimmying a white block forward with his fingers, he opened his secret hiding place. Behind the wall was a wormhole just wide enough for his arm to snake down into. At the end of his reach, he wedged the gold. (He was the tallest man in the village, thus his arms were longest. The few extra inches might make a difference.)
The whitewashed brick and wood panel were set back in place. The door to number 18 was locked, and James entrusted the lock's skeleton key to his best friend. They paid one last visit to his mother's grave in the rice fields, and then James told his grandfather--the man, now in his eighties, who'd raised him--that he would return the following summer. James held back the tears and the fear that it would probably be three or four years before he returned. He knew that he might be seeing his beloved grandfather for the last time.
Jennifer had been given a pink princess dress and a Dorothy Hamill haircut for the occasion. (Somehow, the Dorothy Hamill bob with blunt bangs had made it to China.) Jennifer remembers fretting about whether this American ice skater's haircut would be sufficient to allow her to fit in, but her father seemed confident in what he was doing. In their culture there was no such thing as questioning your father. "Your cousins will teach you," he promised. His own father, sister, and brother had gone to San Francisco twenty years earlier. By now they were thriving. The family would smooth their transition.
They didn't. The family was caught up in their own lives.
They treated the new Louies rudely, mocked them for not speaking English, and overlooked them at Christmas. The new arrivals were never "emotionally claimed," to use James's phrase.
Way too soon the new Louies were on their own, living in Sacramento, running restaurants, sacrificing, trying to assimilate, hoping their children would attend college, maybe even--if they were a very lucky family--the University of California at Berkeley. Which is exactly where Jennifer went. All that unfolded like the great American Dream, but they never knew it would work out like that. In any given moment, they were terrified and powerless and felt like failures and took it out on one another in the way only families can: cruelly. On paper they appeared a success, but financially the extreme hardship never relented. Emotionally, they became dire enemies.
James: "The father my daughter knew was bitter . . . controlling . . . rough." He knows this now, abuse being an American concept he's had to learn.
Jen added, "He also now knows it was illegal to have left his children at home unsupervised every afternoon and evening."
James corrected her, "No, I knew then. I knew."
Jen absorbed this: then, worried her father was shouldering all the blame, offered her own confession: "The daughter my father knew was selfish, she thought only of herself, she was embarrassed by her Chinese heritage, she refused to speak in Cantonese to her parents anywhere in public. In ninth grade I won an award for a poem I had written about my great-grandfather unwillingly letting us go on our last day in China. I didn't even invite my parents to the awards ceremony. I told myself it was because they couldn't come anyway, but the truth was, I was afraid they'd show up in their communist pajamas and embarrass me." Jen dug out the poem from a paperback book her high school had published. I read it quickly. I sensed James's interest. I handed the book to him. He read it as only a man fifteen years too late can read a poem.
In her poems and journals young Jen had started to carve out her own secret life. In high school she lied in order to see boys and go to dances. Her parents sensed all this, and in their minds they had already lost her. Nothing they said or did could keep her from becoming Americanized. When they telephoned her at Berkeley, all they heard was "Yeah Dad, yeah Mom, okay, yeah."
In graduation photos, forced to stand with her parents, she looks positively gloomy.
Then the ultimate indignity: After college their daughter went to work for pennies as a producer for a new cable show, Q-TV, an issues and entertainment show for gays and lesbians. They knew their daughter wasn't a lesbian, but if she had been that might have made more sense. Occasionally she showed up with videotapes, proud of her hard work, hoping to share.
Imagine this scene! Imagine what her parents were feeling.
Continues...
Excerpted from Why Do I Love These People? by Po Bronson Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
loading...
loading...
loading...
Hear our exclusive audio interview with Po Bronson (11:51).
Terms of Use, Copyright, and Privacy Policy
© 1997-2008 Barnesandnoble.com llc