The Truth about Camp David: The Untold Story About The Collapse of the Middle East Peace Process by Clayton E. Swisher, Nation Books (Manufactured by)

BUY THIS ITEM

  • $14.95 List price
  • $3.98 Online price (Save 73%)
  • $3.58 Member price
  • Join Now
  • skip to cart
  • Add To List uiAction=GetAllLists&page=List&pageType=list&ean=9780641787010&productCode=BK&maxCount=100&threshold=3

Usually ships within 24 hours

FIND & RESERVE AN IN-STORE COPY

Enter a zip code

(Paperback - Bargain)

  • Publisher: Avalon Publishing Group
  • Pub. Date: September 2004
  • ISBN-13: 9780641787010
  • Sales Rank: 78,419
  • 455pp
  • Edition Description: Bargain

Note: This is a bargain book and quantities are limited. Bargain books are new but may have slight markings from the publisher and/or stickers showing their discounted price. More about bargain books

 
  • Overview
  • Editorial Reviews
  • Customer Reviews
  • Features
  • Full Product Details

Synopsis

The collapse of both sets of Arab-Israeli negotiations in 2000 led not only to recrimination and bloodshed, with the outbreak of the second intifada, but to the creation of a new myth. Syrian and Palestinian intransigence was blamed for the current disastrous state of affairs, as both parties rejected a "generous" peace offering from the Israelis that would have brought peace to the region.

The Truth About Camp David shatters that myth. Based on the riveting, eyewitness accounts of more than forty direct participants involved in the latest rounds of Arab-Israeli negotiations, including the Camp David 2000 summit, former federal investigator-turned-investigative journalist Clayton E. Swisher provides a compelling counter-narrative to the commonly accepted history. The Truth About Camp David details the tragic inner workings of the Clinton Administration's negotiating mayhem, their eleventh hour blunders and miscalculations, and their concluding decision to end the Oslo process with blame and disengagement. It is not only a fascinating historical look at Middle East politics on the brink of disaster, but a revelatory portrait of how all-too-human American political considerations helped facilitate the present crisis.

Foreign Affairs

Six decades of outsider-mediated efforts to achieve an Israeli-Palestinian settlement have become neatly cataloged in the annals of diplomatic history by place-names: Rhodes, Lausanne, Geneva, Madrid, Oslo, and Camp David. All have left behind disputed histories of what happened, and none more so than the tortuous off-and-on negotiations from July 2000 to the end of January 2001 usually dubbed Camp David II. (The negotiations leading to the 1979 Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty have become Camp David I.) The prevailing view in the United States and Israel is that Yasir Arafat backed away from Prime Minister Ehud Barak's generous offer, demonstrating that under his leadership Palestinians would never accept peace with Israel. Swisher, relying on interviews with U.S., Israeli, and Palestinian officials closely involved, has constructed a different story. He presents a poorly organized U.S. negotiating team with a less-than-clear modus operandi and at least a subconscious tilt toward Israel. He depicts Barak as arrogant and devious. The supposedly generous offer has been misrepresented, he argues. So, too, the presumed categorical Palestinian rejection. Challenging the pieties and political correctness of American discourse, Swisher makes a convincing case. This may not be the definitive "truth about Camp David," but it warrants careful attention from all who would learn from the history of negotiations to secure peace in the Holy Land.

More Reviews and Recommendations

Customer Reviews

  • Reader Rating:
  • Ratings: 1Reviews: 1

Stuff & Nonsenseby Anonymous

Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings

April 13, 2007: Sometime before his book came out, Mr. Swisher contacted me by e-mail asking if I would be interested in reviewing his book on another website. I guess that a small voice within me said 'this is not going to be a balanced account'. The resulting work has proven my intitution right. Apparently Mr. Swisher either doesn't know Arabic or pooh-poohed Arafat's true voice - the one of deceit, of lies, and of violence. The Clintonites gave Arafat every benefit of doubt, inviting him to the White House a whopping 9 times, putting pressure on Dr. Walter Reich and the United States Holocaust Commission to grant this killer - not just of Israelis but of American diplomats in the Sudan and Lebanon - a VIP visit to the U.S. Holocaust Museum. They even undermined the government of Benjamin Netanyahu when he refused to play with the lives of his citizens. All the time Arafat's broadcasts in Arabic to the Palestinians never spoke of peace, but of Jihad, of murdering the Jews. The Clintonites knew this, yet they feted their friend while crucifying an ally. Enter Ehud Barak, whom Swisher describes as 'arrogant' and 'devious'. Barak, at Clinton's prodding first betrayed the Christian Lebanese resistance, the SLA, that had fought Hizbullah for years and brought security to Israel's Northern borders. Under Barak's 'Peace in our time' orders, the IDF without warning abandoned their allies, and hightailed it to the Israeli border. This lesson was not lost on Arafat and his associates, who promptly began preparation for the next Intifada. Unfazed by the dire consequences of abandoning an ally, and an Arab one at that, Barak went to Camp David at Clinton's invitation, and Arafat soon joined him. The entire Israeli negotiation team were prepared to give up the entire Judea-Samaria region to Fatah, with very minor modifications. But what was even more astonishing, and which Swisher and his main contributor, one nonentity from Sandy Berger's NSC - a Robert Malley pooh-pooh, was Barak's offer to turn over half of Jerusalem to Arafat. Can you imagine the House of Saud offering half of Mecca to the Vatican, or Heavens to betsy, the Jews? Even Shlomo Ben Ami, the 'Peace Now' Foreign Minister of Israel was stunned by this gesture. And it was NOT a devious one, but an honest one on Barak's part, even though he knew he'd probably face a collapse of his government had Arafat accepted. But of course Arafat, revolutionary to the core, and man of extreme violence stunned Barak, and perhaps even more so, Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright and walked out - resorting to violence. The violence that was the New Intifada and the series of bombs - of teens, of babies, of families in restaurants, discos, bus stations, colleges, Seders, and Pizzerias. Dennis Ross, no Likud acolyte, was at first flabbergasted, then convinced that Arafat would never choose peace. Hence the main reason he never signed up for Colin Powell -bing - REALITY. But Swisher and Malley will never condemn Arafat in a million years, even though they know better. Read: Yossef Bodansky's 'The High Cost of Peace' or Michael Oren's 'Power, Faith and Fantasy' if you want a more honest account of why Camp David collapsed. Bodansky is - but Oren is no hardliner, yet both men came to virtually the same conclusions about Arafat and the PLO leadership, conclusions that the Clintons, Albright, Barak, and Swisher and Malley could never find. In summation Clinton and Barak were naive and...