Table of Contents
Introduction ix
Revolt in the Boardroom 1
The Battle for the Corporation 85
The New Order 129
The New Power Elite 161
The New CEO 193
Conclusion 215
Notes 225
Acknowledgments 237
Index 239
Read an Excerpt
Revolt in the BoardroomThe New Rules of Power in Corporate America
Chapter One
On Monday, January 10, 2005, Carly Fiorina sat at the very pinnacle of corporate power.
Since 1999, she had been chairman and chief executive of one of the worlds most storied technology companies, Hewlett-Packard, which employed 150,000 people and brought in revenues exceeding $80 billion a year—roughly the economic output of Nigeria.
She had doubled those revenues by engineering a controversial merger with Compaq Computer Corporation in 2002—a merger that had been contested publicly by Walter Hewlett, son of one of the companys revered founders. It had been a grueling, vicious and highly personal battle for her.
But she had won.
In the process, Carly Fiorina had proven herself to be one of the most talented business leaders of her generation. She was charismatic and compelling—able to win the hearts and minds of audiences large or small. As one executive who worked with her at Lucent Technologies Inc. put it, "She could sell ice to Eskimos."
Because of that skill, she was now widely heralded as the most powerful woman in business. She traveled the world, giving hundreds of public speeches, and frequently graced the covers of business magazines. She made such an impression on the public consciousness that, in many business circles, she could be easily identified by one name alone.
She was Carly.
Her position and her power—like those of her colleagues at the very top of the corporate pyramid—in some ways rivaled the position and power of great rulers. At the turn ofthe century, CEOs were unconstrained by powerful ministers or legislators, unchallenged in meaningful elections, unencumbered by burdensome constitutional constraints, and usually unthreatened by rebellious underlings. The previous century had seen the flattening of political hierarchies throughout the world. But at the giant corporations that spanned the globe, controlled much of the worlds commerce and generated much of the worlds wealth, the CEO still sat on top of a clear hierarchy, and his or her strength and authority remained largely unchallenged.
CEOs pay mirrored that power. Fiorina brought home an annual paycheck that was 20 times that of President George Bush. In her leisure time, she cruised on her large, private yacht.
Particularly in the United States, CEOs like Fiorina were used to getting their way. Technically, they were appointed by, and reported to, their boards of directors. But many, like Fiorina, held the title of Chairman of the Board as well as Chief Executive. They set the boards agenda and controlled much of the boards access to information. They benefited from a business culture, developed during the 20th century, that held that strong, even autocratic, CEOs offered the best route to business success. The successful CEO wasnt first among equals; the CEO was boss.
In Fiorinas case, this position of power was particularly sweet because she was a woman. The ranks of corporate power, far more than the ranks of political power, had remained the province of men throughout the 20th century. When the elite members of the Business Council held their regular meetings, there were seldom more than one or two women in the crowded room—or for that matter, more than one or two African Americans. In recent years, a few prominent women, like Meg Whitman of eBay Inc. or Anne Mulcahy of Xerox Corporation or Andrea Jung of Avon Products, had broken through the glass ceiling and made it to the top. But at the beginning of 2005, those women were still scarce enough to be counted on the fingers of two hands. Among Fortune 500 companies, no more than 10 had female CEOs.
Testosterone ran particularly strong in the telecommunications world, where Fiorina made her career. In spite of its nickname, "Ma Bell" and her progeny were overwhelmingly male enterprises. As a young executive at Lucent, an offshoot of AT&T, she suffered the indignity of a boss who once introduced her as "our token bimbo." ("You will never do that to me again," she told him afterward.) She had once attended an all-male sales lunch at a club where scantily dressed women danced on the tops of tables. Her male colleagues had suggested she skip the lunch, which they had arranged, but she refused, arriving in her most serious-looking business attire. The dancers said they wouldnt dance at the table "until the lady leaves." Later, when Lucent bought Ascend Communications—a company with a legendary cowboy culture—some at Ascend were critical of their new acquirers, saying the Lucent sales force "didnt have any balls." Fiorina appeared onstage at the first joint sales meeting in cowboy boots and with a pair of her husbands socks stuffed in the crotch of her pants, declaring to the stunned Ascend team, "Our balls are as big as anyones in this room."
But for Carly, that was all in the past. Now she sat where the men had sat before her. She enjoyed the pay and the perks and, most important, the power that came with the job of chairman of the board and chief executive officer of one of the worlds great corporations. She had triumphed in a mans world.
Or so she thought.
But on January 10, 2005, that world was changing.
Without Fiorinas knowledge, members of her board of directors had held a series of highly unusual telephone conversations in December and early January to discuss their dissatisfaction with her leadership.
The company certainly had its problems. Its stock was flagging—55 percent below where it had been when Carly took over in 1999. And it had failed to meet its financial projections for the third quarter of 2004, which ended July 31—prompting complaints from Wall Street analysts. Neither problem suggested crisis. All technology stocks were trading well below their breathless levels of 1999, and many companies occasionally missed their financial targets. Indeed, Fiorina liked to point out that before she took over, HP had missed Wall Streets earnings expectations for nine quarters straight. Moreover, she had acted quickly to address the third quarter situation—firing three top sales executives whom she blamed for the miss, and coming up with a plan for moving forward.
Revolt in the Boardroom
The New Rules of Power in Corporate America. Copyright © by Alan Murray. Reprinted by permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. Available now wherever books are sold.
Read a Sample Chapter
Revolt in the BoardroomThe New Rules of Power in Corporate America
Chapter One
On Monday, January 10, 2005, Carly Fiorina sat at the very pinnacle of corporate power.
Since 1999, she had been chairman and chief executive of one of the worlds most storied technology companies, Hewlett-Packard, which employed 150,000 people and brought in revenues exceeding $80 billion a year—roughly the economic output of Nigeria.
She had doubled those revenues by engineering a controversial merger with Compaq Computer Corporation in 2002—a merger that had been contested publicly by Walter Hewlett, son of one of the companys revered founders. It had been a grueling, vicious and highly personal battle for her.
But she had won.
In the process, Carly Fiorina had proven herself to be one of the most talented business leaders of her generation. She was charismatic and compelling—able to win the hearts and minds of audiences large or small. As one executive who worked with her at Lucent Technologies Inc. put it, "She could sell ice to Eskimos."
Because of that skill, she was now widely heralded as the most powerful woman in business. She traveled the world, giving hundreds of public speeches, and frequently graced the covers of business magazines. She made such an impression on the public consciousness that, in many business circles, she could be easily identified by one name alone.
She was Carly.
Her position and her power—like those of her colleagues at the very top of the corporate pyramid—in some ways rivaled the position and power of great rulers. At the turnof the century, CEOs were unconstrained by powerful ministers or legislators, unchallenged in meaningful elections, unencumbered by burdensome constitutional constraints, and usually unthreatened by rebellious underlings. The previous century had seen the flattening of political hierarchies throughout the world. But at the giant corporations that spanned the globe, controlled much of the worlds commerce and generated much of the worlds wealth, the CEO still sat on top of a clear hierarchy, and his or her strength and authority remained largely unchallenged.
CEOs pay mirrored that power. Fiorina brought home an annual paycheck that was 20 times that of President George Bush. In her leisure time, she cruised on her large, private yacht.
Particularly in the United States, CEOs like Fiorina were used to getting their way. Technically, they were appointed by, and reported to, their boards of directors. But many, like Fiorina, held the title of Chairman of the Board as well as Chief Executive. They set the boards agenda and controlled much of the boards access to information. They benefited from a business culture, developed during the 20th century, that held that strong, even autocratic, CEOs offered the best route to business success. The successful CEO wasnt first among equals; the CEO was boss.
In Fiorinas case, this position of power was particularly sweet because she was a woman. The ranks of corporate power, far more than the ranks of political power, had remained the province of men throughout the 20th century. When the elite members of the Business Council held their regular meetings, there were seldom more than one or two women in the crowded room—or for that matter, more than one or two African Americans. In recent years, a few prominent women, like Meg Whitman of eBay Inc. or Anne Mulcahy of Xerox Corporation or Andrea Jung of Avon Products, had broken through the glass ceiling and made it to the top. But at the beginning of 2005, those women were still scarce enough to be counted on the fingers of two hands. Among Fortune 500 companies, no more than 10 had female CEOs.
Testosterone ran particularly strong in the telecommunications world, where Fiorina made her career. In spite of its nickname, "Ma Bell" and her progeny were overwhelmingly male enterprises. As a young executive at Lucent, an offshoot of AT&T, she suffered the indignity of a boss who once introduced her as "our token bimbo." ("You will never do that to me again," she told him afterward.) She had once attended an all-male sales lunch at a club where scantily dressed women danced on the tops of tables. Her male colleagues had suggested she skip the lunch, which they had arranged, but she refused, arriving in her most serious-looking business attire. The dancers said they wouldnt dance at the table "until the lady leaves." Later, when Lucent bought Ascend Communications—a company with a legendary cowboy culture—some at Ascend were critical of their new acquirers, saying the Lucent sales force "didnt have any balls." Fiorina appeared onstage at the first joint sales meeting in cowboy boots and with a pair of her husbands socks stuffed in the crotch of her pants, declaring to the stunned Ascend team, "Our balls are as big as anyones in this room."
But for Carly, that was all in the past. Now she sat where the men had sat before her. She enjoyed the pay and the perks and, most important, the power that came with the job of chairman of the board and chief executive officer of one of the worlds great corporations. She had triumphed in a mans world.
Or so she thought.
But on January 10, 2005, that world was changing.
Without Fiorinas knowledge, members of her board of directors had held a series of highly unusual telephone conversations in December and early January to discuss their dissatisfaction with her leadership.
The company certainly had its problems. Its stock was flagging—55 percent below where it had been when Carly took over in 1999. And it had failed to meet its financial projections for the third quarter of 2004, which ended July 31—prompting complaints from Wall Street analysts. Neither problem suggested crisis. All technology stocks were trading well below their breathless levels of 1999, and many companies occasionally missed their financial targets. Indeed, Fiorina liked to point out that before she took over, HP had missed Wall Streets earnings expectations for nine quarters straight. Moreover, she had acted quickly to address the third quarter situation—firing three top sales executives whom she blamed for the miss, and coming up with a plan for moving forward.
Revolt in the Boardroom
The New Rules of Power in Corporate America. Copyright © by Alan Murray. Reprinted by permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. Available now wherever books are sold.