
Reserve it at BN.com & pick it up in 60 minutes at your local store.
Enter a zip code
(Hardcover - New Edition)
The humble aim of this volume is to bring philosophy together between two covers. Proof of its success includes over 2,200 entries explaining everything from akrasia to externalism, modality and pragmatism, with longer articles on such puzzlers as the problems of the philosophy of science. For those of us whose ten-year-old copy of this valuable reference is falling apart from overuse, this new edition features over 300 new articles, biographies, new entries on key concepts, and a chronological chart of the history of philosophy. Articles are signed and include references and editor Honderich (philosophy emeritus, University College, London) has kindly provided a comprehensive index, portraits of the great minds and a guide to logical symbols. Annotation ©2005 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR
With The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, readers have the most authoritative and engaging one-volume reference work on philosophy available, offering clear and reliable guidance to the ideas of all notable philosophers from antiquity to the present day, and to the major philosophical systems around the globe, from Confucianism to phenomenology. 94 illustrations.
A decade ago, an international team of 249 contributors assembled over 2000 entries in the original edition of this standard companion to philosophy. Magisterial and unrivaled then, the new edition remains the definitive reference guide to the world of philosophy, from abandonment to Zoroastrianism. Now, edited by well-known UK-based philosopher Honderich (philosophy of mind & logic, Univ. Coll., London)-and with 291 contributors-the articles have been lengthened and revised in most cases. Over 300 new ones on topics ranging from animal consciousness and globalization to terrorism have been added. The entries include short profiles of contemporary philosophers such as Jacques Derrida, Alasdair MacIntyre, and Bernard Williams and longer biographical essays on major philosophers from Plato and Aristotle to Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. Short entries discuss concepts (death, universalism), theories (deontological ethics, utilitarianism), and movements (the Frankfurt School, the Vienna Circle) and move beyond Western philosophy to include articles on Islamic and Japanese philosophy and schools like Confucianism and Jainism. There are some philosophical mistakes worth noting: Hegel's "dialectic" never used the thesis/ antithesis/synthesis model, which Fichte introduced, and also some regrettable omissions (e.g., Why doesn't an "updated" edition include more than an 18-year-old secondary source in a much-too short entry on Derrida?). Bottom Line The tone of this work edges more toward analytic than continental philosophy, which explains why the entry on C.S. Pierce, for example, is overwhelmingly longer than the entries on John Dewey, William James, and Josiah Royce. These are quibbles, however, given the overall quality and completeness. Students will find it extremely valuable. Essential for all libraries.-Henry L. Carrigan Jr., Lancaster, PA Copyright 2005 Reed Business Information.
More Reviews and Recommendations
Ted Honderich is Emeritus Grote Professor of the Philosophy of Mind and Logic at University College London. His major work is A Theory of Determinism: The Mind, Neuroscience, and Life-Hopes and is also known for his writings on political philosophy and for the widely successful philosophy readers which he has edited.
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
May 06, 2009: This work is comparable in many ways to the Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy: both are modeled on the dictionary format, both are multi-authored, both are very popular, both are in second edition. I have spent many happy hours with each. Each has its excellent and useful entries and each has its mediocre or useless entries. For many purposes they are interchangeable. However, Cambridge charges a little over half of what Oxford wants, but the latter is definitely no better. In fact, the logic entries in the Cambridge are uniformly better. The Cambridge entry "Church's thesis" is written by Wilfried Sieg, an accomplished and respected expert in the field. The Oxford entry is by Stewart Shapiro, an equally qualified expert. Both imply correctly that Church's thesis is not a proposition admitting of mathematical proof or disproof in the usual sense: it is a proposal to "identify" the pre-theoretic intuitive concept of "effectively calculable function" with the mathematically precise number-theoretic property "recursiveness". But, the Cambridge entry is several times as long the Oxford and it is much more informative concerning the historical and philosophical importance of Church's thesis. A somewhat different comparison applies to the entries titled "Church, Alonzo". Again, the Cambridge entry is much longer and much more informative than the Oxford. The Cambridge entry is by John Corcoran, one of the editors of the journal HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC, whereas the Oxford entry is by Gregory Mellema, who does not have much of a track record in the field. Both entries are flawed. Toward the end of Corcoran's otherwise accurate piece there is a confusing typographical error: 'Church's thesis' is printed where 'Church's theorem' is clearly meant. Mellema's murky and overly elliptical piece does not make it clear that Church's thesis has not been and cannot be proved in the usual sense; it even suggests the opposite by referring to it as a "result"--a word widely used as a synonym for 'theorem'. The Cambridge victory is far from being a shutout. Oxford deserves some points for its two appendixes: one presents a set of "Maps of Philosophy"--which are well worth looking at even if you ultimately think you could have done better yourself--and a useful if somewhat subjective "Chronological Table of Philosophy". I recommend buying the Cambridge but looking at the Oxford in your library's reference room.