
Reserve it at BN.com & pick it up in 60 minutes at your local store.
Enter a zip code
(Hardcover)
| More Formats | |
|---|---|
| Available in eBook | $9.99 |
Chronicling the rise and fall of the efficient market theory and the century-long making of the modern financial industry, Justin Fox's The Myth of the Rational Market is as much an intellectual whodunit as a cultural history of the perils and possibilities of risk. The book brings to life the people and ideas that forged modern finance and investing, from the formative days of Wall Street through the Great Depression and into the financial calamity of today. It's a tale that features professors who made and lost fortunes, battled fiercely over ideas, beat the house in blackjack, wrote bestselling books, and played major roles on the world stage. It's also a tale of Wall Street's evolution, the power of the market to generate wealth and wreak havoc, and free market capitalism's war with itself.
The efficient market hypothesis—long part of academic folklore but codified in the 1960s at the University of Chicago—has evolved into a powerful myth. It has been the maker and loser of fortunes, the driver of trillions of dollars, the inspiration for index funds and vast new derivatives markets, and the guidepost for thousands of careers. The theory holds that the market is always right, and that the decisions of millions of rational investors, all acting on information to outsmart one another, always provide the best judge of a stock's value. That myth is crumbling.
Celebrated journalist and columnist Fox introduces a new wave of economists and scholars who no longer teach that investors are rational or that the markets are always right. Many of them now agree with Yale professor Robert Shiller that the efficient markets theory represents one ofthe most remarkable errors in the history of economic thought. Today the theory has given way to counterintuitive hypotheses about human behavior, psychological models of decision making, and the irrationality of the markets. Investors overreact, underreact, and make irrational decisions based on imperfect data. In his landmark treatment of the history of the world's markets, Fox uncovers the new ideas that may come to drive the market in the century ahead.
Do we really need yet another book about the financial crisis? Yes, we dobecause this one is different. Instead of focusing on the errors and abuses of the bankers, Fox…tells the story of the professors who enabled those abuses under the banner of the financial theory known as the efficient-market hypothesis. Fox's book is not an idle exercise in intellectual history, which makes it a must-read for anyone who wants to understand the mess we're in.
More Reviews and RecommendationsJustin Fox is the business and economics columnist for Time magazine and the author of the popular Time.com blog The Curious Capitalist (www.time.com/curiouscapitalist). Previously an editor and writer at Fortune, he appears regularly on CNN, CNBC, and PBS's Nightly Business Report. He lives in New York City with his wife and son.
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
August 29, 2009: The book is much less about why the rational market theories are wrong and more about their development history. It is superb in its description of how the theories developed, the personalities that defined them, the theories' somewhat accidental popularization despite most of the proponents having doubts from the start and most importantly, the linkages between most major developers (teacher-student, peers, family relations, rivalries etc).
As good as the book is, it fails to sufficiently describe the logical flaws which is perhaps what those attracted to the book's title are looking for. When one thinks about it, it is really strange that a theory that was designed to describe some human institutions (markets) and their processes, and not an idyllic exercise in rationality, almost never moved away from the examples of one single market - American stock market.While the US markets themselves are irrational, if someone had tried to apply the same logic in other markets, the fallacy of the efficiency logic and calculations would have been evident much earlier (unless of course one did not try to explain away by the assumption that rationality is the domain of people operating in specific markets). Also, it is strange why the same theories were almost never attempted on non-equity markets (how about defining beta for properties in various locations or commodities or currencies!!).It is also interesting to note that almost all the people involved in the efficient market theory and those in the opposition are Americans or at least professors in American universities. This is not just particularly odd but should have many other implications - the spread of one set of market ideas across the world without sufficient new thoughts or debates by anyone else. Odd that no Japanese, Chinese, Indian, French or German tried to come up with new capital theories or calculations by looking at their own markets but all kept on using formulas supplied by a set of academicians that at best worked in one financial market.The book makes one think in many other directions and that's its biggest achievement. Certainly a must read but expect it to turn dated soon as the space is changing rapidly and many more are expected to expound on the subject in near future.Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
June 18, 2009: This is a great book for novice investors and 1st year finance majors. I rememeber sitting in my first Finance class and the professor said: "Good luck trying to beat the market! It's efficient!" I wish I could read this book back then. The book is not comprehensive enough for professionals but for someone with general interest in history it is great. It is also good introduction for someone into financial world. It lacks in-depth research on derivatives but it is good as a first step into finance.