Textbook (Hardcover - Older Edition)
| More Formats | Online Price |
|---|---|
| Hardcover - REV | $35.95 |
| Paperback - REV | $24.95 |
Reprint of the fine original of 1996 (first edition, 1986).
Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)
The rapidly changing nature of medical research justifies regular revisions of medical dictionaries and several excellent volumes have been published in the last few years. Of the recent releases, this dictionary may have the most comprehensive range of terminology. Besides the usual definitions of diseases and medical tests, this edition includes terms from genetics (junk DNA, retrotransposon) and sports medicine (Tommy John surgery) as well as popular terminology (sick headache, morning breath) and dietary supplements (SAMe). Definitions are current (SARS) but quite brief. One of Merriam Webster's strengths is the inclusion of eponyms; however, this dictionary does not provide illustrations and has minimal supplemental information. The previous edition of Merriam Webster's medical dictionary is available electronically at no cost through medlineplus and is scheduled for update later this year. Many of these definitions remain the same, and their brevity makes the online version a useful alternative. Taber's Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary, though expensive, has more thorough definitions and includes extensive color illustrations as well as lengthy appendixes. Tabor's also includes eponyms but in less detail than Merriam Webster. Like Merriam Webster, the 2004 edition of American Heritage Stedman's Medical Dictionary has brief definitions but does include a few more supplemental features. Black's Medical Dictionary released its latest version in the United States in 2004, but that edition was actually published in Britain in 2002 making it less current than the other recent releases. Bottom Line When faced with these excellent choices, academic and health libraries will be more satisfied with the 2005 edition of Tabor's, but smaller public libraries may find Merriam Webster's reasonable cost and breadth of coverage useful.-Tina Neville, Univ. of South Florida Lib., St. Petersburg Copyright 2005 Reed Business Information.
More Reviews and RecommendationsMerriam Webster Inc, Springfield, MA
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
October 12, 2004: Put frankly, they've made a mess of this one. Much of the terminology is hopelessly outdated. The definitions are not very helpful to professionals and I'd imagine that students would have a horrible time with this book. If you're looking for a good medical dictionary, keep looking. Don't waste your time or money with this one.