(Hardcover)
| More Formats | |
|---|---|
| Paperback | $30.00 |
The book of Genesis tells us that God made a covenant with Abraham, promising him a glorious posterity on the condition that he and all his male descendents must be circumcised. For thousands of years thereafter, the distinctive practice of circumcision served to set the Jews apart from their neighbors. The apostle Paul rejected it as a worthless practice, emblematic of Judaism's fixation on physical matters. Christian theologians followed his lead, arguing that whereas Christians sought spiritual fulfillment, Jews remained mired in such pointless concerns as diet and circumcision. As time went on, Europeans developed folklore about malicious Jews who performed sacrificial murders of Christian children and delighted in genital mutilation. But Jews held unwaveringly to the belief that being a Jewish male meant being physically circumcised and to this day even most non-observant Jews continue to follow this practice. In this book, Leonard B. Glick offers a history of Jewish and Christian beliefs about circumcision from its ancient origins to the current controversy. By the turn of the century, more and more physicians in America and England--but not, interestingly, in continental Europe--were performing the procedure routinely. Glick shows that Jewish American physicians were and continue to be especially vocal and influential champions of the practice which, he notes, serves to erase the visible difference between Jewish and gentile males. Informed medical opinion is now unanimous that circumcision confers no benefit and the practice has declined. In Jewish circles it is virtually taboo to question circumcision, but Glick does not flinch from asking whether this procedure shouldcontinue to be the defining feature of modern Jewish identity.
Leonard B. Glick is a cultural anthropologist with a medical degree and a doctorate in anthropology. He is Professor Emeritus of Anthropology at Hampshire College and is the author of Abraham's Heirs: Jews and Christians in Medieval Europe (1999).
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
December 18, 2008: I HAVE READ OVER 40 BOOKS ON THIS SUBJECT AND I HAVE TO SAY THAT THIS IS THE BEST BOOK ABOUT CIRCUMCISION EVER. PLEASE READ THIS BOOK IF YOU HAVE DOUBTS ABOUT THIS PROCEDURE OR IF YOU ARE SO CERTAIN THAT IT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO. THERE IS SO MUCH MISINFORMATION OUT THERE THAT PEOPLE GET CONFUSED ABOUT CIRCUMCISION. ALL YOUR ANSWERS TO YOUR QUESTIONS ARE IN THIS BOOK. ED SCHOEN WANTS TO BE CALLED THE #1 EXPERT JUST BECAUSE HE IS A PEDIATRICIAN. HE IS ALL PRO-CIRCUMCISION AND HE HAS NO CLUE OR IGNORES WHAT IT DOES TO AN INFANT WHO IS BEING CIRCUMCISED. ANY DOCTOR WHO IS PRO-CIRCUMCISION NEEDS TO HAVE THEIR HEAD EXAMINED.