Enter a zip code
(Hardcover)
How the accidents of evolution created our quirky, imperfect minds---and what we can do about it.
Why are we subject to irrational beliefs, inaccurate memories, even war? We can thank evolution, Marcus says, which can only tinker with structures that already exist, rather than create new ones: "Natural selection... tends to favor genes that have immediate advantages" rather than long-term value. Marcus (The Birth of the Mind), director of NYU's Infant Language Learning Center, refers to this as "kluge," a term engineers use to refer to a clumsily designed solution to a problem. Thus, memory developed in our prehominid ancestry to respond with immediacy, rather than accuracy; one result is erroneous eyewitness testimony in courtrooms. In describing the results of studies of human perception, cognition and beliefs, Marcus encapsulates how the mind is "contaminated by emotions, moods, desires, goals, and simple self-interest...." The mind's fragility, he says, is demonstrated by mental illness, which seems to have no adaptive purpose. In a concluding chapter, Marcus offers a baker's dozen of suggestions for getting around the brain's flaws and achieving "true wisdom." While some are self-evident, others could be helpful, such as "Whenever possible, consider alternate hypotheses" and "Don't just set goals. Make contingency plans." Using evolutionary psychology, Marcus educates the reader about mental flaws in a succinct, often enjoyable way. (Apr. 16)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. More Reviews and RecommendationsGARY MARCUS is a professor of psychology at New York University and director of the NYU Infant Language Learning Center. A high school dropout, Marcus received his Ph.D. at age twenty-three from MIT, where he was mentored by Steven Pinker. He was a tenured professor by age thirty. The author of The Birth of the Mind and editor of the Norton Psychology Reader, he has been a fellow at the prestigious Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford. His writing has appeared in the New York Times, the Philadelphia Inquirer, Newsday, the Los Angeles Times, and other major publications.
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
September 08, 2008: Whoever wrote the preceding review obviously doesn't pay attention.The author was never self-contradictory at all.He said we don't have postal-code memory where every memory has an address like a computer.If evolution had come up with this first then layered contextual memory on top,this would be more efficient.The author then said some people use mnemonics to aid memorization.But this a trick to aid memory and this of course does not mean our memory is optimally designed. How is this in any way contradictory?
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
August 09, 2008: I was listening to the BookTV Cspan channel from my porch, while doing my yoga, today. The author of 'Kluge', Gary Marcus was in a bookstore talking about his book. Basically, his book is making the argument that the brain does not have an intelligent design to it, touching on what he calls evolution. Please tell me that there are others who made note of all of his illogical comments with which he is basing his argument on. 'And to top it off, he actually has the argument against his book right in his discussion. For example, he argues that our brain doesn't have a certain memory trait, but then demonstrates that we can exercise it to do just what he says that we can't. Please. I can imagine that his next book might argue the opposite of this book, as though it's just an exercise in the ability to argue any side to a topic. Without naming off all of his contradictory statements, I'd just like to say that, generally, his posit is based on the idea that an intelligent design would be that which a robot encompasses. I don't know of any intelligent design proponent who has argued that being designed as robots was what our creator had intended. 'Beware of 'experts' who's forte is debate.