
Reserve it at BN.com & pick it up in 60 minutes at your local store.
Enter a zip code
(Hardcover)
| More Formats | |
|---|---|
| Available in eBook | $22.36 |
| Paperback - Reprint | $16.15 |
| MP3 Book - Unabridged | $23.19 |
A controversial challenge to the works of Ron Chernow and David McCullough
With Fallen Founder , Nancy Isenberg plumbs rare and obscure sources to shed new light on everyone's favorite founding villain. The Aaron Burr whom we meet through Isenberg's eye-opening biography is a feminist, an Enlightenment figure on par with Jefferson, a patriot, and—most importantly—a man with powerful enemies in an age of vitriolic political fighting. Revealing the gritty reality of eighteenth-century America, Fallen Founder is the authoritative restoration of a figure who ran afoul of history and a much-needed antidote to the hagiography of the revolutionary era.
Isenberg's meticulous biography reveals a gifted lawyer, politician and orator who championed civility in government and even feminist ideals, in a political climate that bears a marked resemblance to our own.
More Reviews and RecommendationsNancy Isenberg is the Mary Frances Barnard Chair in nineteenth-century American history at the University of Tulsa. She is the author of Sex and Citizenship in Antebellum America, which was chosen as the best book in the field for 1999 by the Society of Historians of the Early American Republic.
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
August 29, 2009: To GPA and Anonymous - you hit the nail right on the head!! Nancy Isenberg's work is that of a groupie. She seems to think all of the other historians who wrote unflattering or negative works about Burr were knotheads, that a cabal of them were out to get him just because he was a liberal. It seems that no historical person of that period - Washington, Hamilton, Jefferson, Madison, among others - were the mental or political equals of Burr. I can't begin to list my problems with this work. Suffice to say that I'm 63 and have been reading and studing history for almost 50 years and this is the most biased work I have ever read!
Reader Rating:
See Detailed Ratings
June 24, 2009: Isenberg gives a fine though sometimes overly sympathetic work on Burr. Clearly he was not a Saint but he was not exactly the sinner, assassin or traitor either. Burr is a product of his time. Ambitious and greedy, his actions are no better or worse than those of his contemporaries.
His tragic fall is made worse by the fact that he was Vice President of the United States. He is a product of an emerging political party system. If Alexander Hamilton lived and Burr died, would Hamilton be so revered today or would we be lamenting the loss of a patriotic Vice President?I don't see any apologies in the book. I think the author's treatment of Burr's contemporaries is consistent with other history books. She does portray a more sympathetic view of Burr rather than the agressive lawyer that he was. That does not detract from the book. I would have enjoyed more details on Burr's later life.