Climate Confusion: How Global Warming Hysteria Leads to Bad Science, Pandering Politicians and Misguided Policies that Hurt the Poor by Roy Spencer

BUY IT NEW

  • $21.95 List price
  • $17.56 Online price (Save 20%)
  • $15.80 Member price
  • Join Now
  • skip to cart
  • Add to Wish List

Usually ships within 24 hours

FIND IT IN OUR STORES

Enter a zip code

(Hardcover)

Average Customer Rating: Customer Rating for this product is 4.5 out of 5 (13 ratings)

Read customer reviews   Write a Review

  • Publisher: Encounter Books
  • Pub. Date: March 2008
  • ISBN-13: 9781594032103
  • Sales Rank: 1,407
  • 191pp
 
  • Overview
  • Editorial Reviews
  • Customer Reviews
  • Features
  • Full Product Details

Synopsis

Roy Spencer shows that fears about global warming are vastly exaggerated and are driven by politics, not truth. A global superstorm has already arrived - but it is a storm of hype and hysteria. This ground-breaking book combines impeccable scientific authority with great wit to expose the hysteria surrounding the myths of global warming and climate change. Spencer shows that the earth is far more resilient than we think.

More Reviews and Recommendations

Customer Reviews

Number of Reviews: 13
Average Rating: Customer Rating for this product is 4.5 out of 5
Write a Review


Customer Rating for this product is 5 out of 5 Why the fear factor?
A reviewer, an engineer in bldg construction., 08/06/2008

Cliamte Confusion provides a realistic look at the Global Warming Alarmist understanding of climate and the minimal implact that man really has on the world's climate.

Customer Rating for this product is 3 out of 5 mixed bag
Paul, A reviewer, 07/30/2008

In 'Climate Confusion', climate scientist Roy Spencer does a good job of making the case that the science isn't necessarily settled on the issue of humanity's role in influencing global climate by increasing the amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels. He explains how little we actually know about one of principal drivers of climate--precipitation, and how efforts to predict future climate through computer modeling is suspect because of the significant gaps in knowledge about the climate system. However, as Mr. Spencer criticizes bureacrats, environmentalists, and politicians, the U.N., etc. for making policy prescriptions to address climate change based on their left leaning political views, he nevertheless has no problem with advocating a response to the issue that is straight out of the playbook of conservative ideology, even going so far as to devote an entire chapter on the virtues of conservative economic policy. He also can barely contain his disdain for government institutions like the EPA and generally regards its work as part of the problem. I beg to differ. Spencer is right to point out the hypocrisy of many celebrity actors/environmentalists who implore us to cut back on our carbon use, as they themselves fly around on private jets. They don't have the moral high ground on this issue, but neither does he. I agree that some environmental groups are indeed too extreme in their oppostion to just about everything, like oil extraction from ANWR, nuclear power, etc., but Mr. Spencer seems to hold them in utter contempt. He likens the banning of DDT to a modern-day holocaust perpertrated by radical environmentalists who are indirectly resonsible for the deaths of millions of Africans. Without question, we can look at whether the ban should be lifted under certain conditions, but this type of inflammatory rhetoric is not worthy of being part of the debate on these important issues. I respect Mr. Spencer's acumen on the subject of the human contribution 'or lack thereof' to global warming and I learned from reading his book. However, I think that his arguments lose some of their impact when they are dressed in his own biases and partisanship.

More Customer Reviews